A day later and I'm sitting here still thinking about this Driver. Really hoping for a chance to hit it in the near future. Love the look and all the feedback so far. Very interested. I still currently game the Epic so 2019 will be a year to upgrade
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I love the story behind the face tech. Very bold to start talking about manufacturing tolerances. I've got to try this one for sure
I do wonder why they went with a COR statement when it’s kind of... 10 years old. Maybe just cause they figure the consumer still knows that term? That’s about the only reason I can think of.
COR is what's matters for ball speed (it's the ratio of velocity before and after contact), CT is what's measured and constrained by the USGA.
Right, but not many companies still really use that in their advertising it seems? Their major competition are all flirting with that .830 limit. It’s like a phone company bragging about their newest phone is 4G LTE capable. Awesome. So is everyone else’s?
It's nuanced, but technically COR is not limited in drivers, CT is. They're related, but not exactly the same. You could feasibly stay within CT and have a COR slightly higher than originally thought you could get with that CT.
And this might be more relevant for another thread, but this kind of thing is exactly what computational optimization techniques are really good at doing - keeping one constraint while improving performance in another...
That is a fine nuance indeed, I thought for sure the max they’re allowed to do was .830
Has anyone thought like me that I should be hitting 450 yd drives since every new driver claims they add 10-20 yds to your drives?
Has anyone thought like me that I should be hitting 450 yd drives since every new driver claims they add 10-20 yds to your drives?
Has anyone thought like me that I should be hitting 450 yd drives since every new driver claims they add 10-20 yds to your drives?
What’s the benefit of “getting faster”?Interesting thread to post this question in.
Pretty sure TaylorMade's story for 2019 is "everybody gets faster" not everbody gets longer.
Thanks for the nice write-up Dan, as well as others who have commented on their experiences too with the various TM drivers.
I'm a long time TM SLDR user, and I think it's time for an upgrade. Which type of driver should I be looking for...that is to say the adjustable type (M5), or the non adjustable ones (M6)? What are the benefits and drawbacks to each type given similar swings?
Thanks!
At the end of my lesson today my coach asked if I wanted to hit the M5 and M6. I said of course. From a look, sound, and feel standpoint IMO Taylor Made nailed it on all accounts. I have been a big fan of the look of both iterations of M1/M2 and M3/M4. The M5/M6 are the best looking of the bunch at least to me. At setup both drivers frame the ball beautifully. The sound was pleasantly muted - loud but not to loud. The feel is solid and just felt good. Compared to my M2 (2017) it just felt like the ball was coming of the face faster with both drivers
I hit 10 balls each with my driver 2017 m2 fuji speeder evo xflex 10.5 turned down to 9. The M5 was a 9 degree head and the M6 was a 10.5 turned down to 9. Used my shaft in the M5 and M6. While I thought the M6 felt better than my M2 there wasn't much difference for me. Similar ball speed numbers ( low 160's), launch (14), spin numbers (2600 to 2700 range)and smash (1.49). The M5 however was a different story. Ball speed increased by 5 mph (mid to high 160's) same launch (14), spin dropped 400 rpm (2200 range) and smash 1.50. I was shocked in the M5. Historically I have not hit the adjustable TM drivers well. I preferred the burners back in the day and M2/M4 recently. I will test them both out a couple of more times but I could see the M5 in the bag. It today's story repeats itself again.
The M5 Tour is a thing of beauty from the top. I have to get it in hand though as the face looks a little odd. Almost like the gray crown folds over the face a great deal.For me, this is the best looking crown out of all the 2019 drivers. Looks stunning in pics, and I'm sure I'll get to see it in hand next month when new product finally makes its way down here.
I'm glad there's a THP event with TM this year because for me, the implementation of their face tech needs a little more explanation. I'm glad TM is focusing on making their faces faster - last year I played a handful of rounds with the '17 M1 and was getting good launch, flight, and great consistency, but it was just not fast.
Where I get lost with this is - how is the amount of "Slow foam" being regulated per head? Are we to believe each head is being tested in every spot on it and then their formula is being added to specific parts behind each face? That seems incredibly hard to implement.
I get Cobra's message of machine CNC milling to get the best tolerances possible. I also get AI running iteration after iteration trying to get optimal ball speeds across the biggest portion of the face. Again, I'm sure clarification is coming. Right now that's the reason I'm not excited with the tech.
Where I get lost with this is - how is the amount of "Slow foam" being regulated per head?
Always worth testing imo. I had a full fitting at Club Champion last year. Tried every new driver and shaft combo. At the end of the day the driver my current setup was the best for me. Nothing wrong with sticking with what you have. If it works for you.It's going to take a lot for me to switch from my M2. It's simply one of the best drivers ever made, imo. It just produces the right amount of spin for my swing. It seems like on course, nothing can beat it. My LTD Pro and G400LST have come closest so far. I'm intrigued by the difference in number you saw. I may test the new M line later in the spring....