I honestly have no idea why this bugs me so much. I think it comes from a fact that a company can progress, be unique, and offer innovations that truly do change how putters are used gets ignored. But SC gets a ton of love for being amazing and works of art, when they are just shinier versions of somebody else's hardwork.I'm one of the most critical out there of him but my dander is much less raised by this than some apparently.
Its not a unique shape? Sure it is. How is that not unique?
As for the taking of somebody elses ideas, I think that SC has been more guilty than most in doing this over the years, but for this one, I think its getting a bad wrap. It does not say "inspired by my innovation". Maybe he means it was inspired by someone elses innovation and perfected by him?
Does he blatantly copy? Sure does, look at the red dot.
Is this different? A little bit.
But he has had many of his own designs, the issue is that they do not sell well (outside of GoLo, which sold okay).
I know that it all comes down to money, and he makes a lot of it. Good on him. I just think he's a joke. A joke with a lot of money. So does that mean the joke's on me? It most likely does.