jt2929
Equipment Junkie
Damn!!!!! The masters won't be the same, I'm bummed
Why won't it be the same? The Masters is The Masters with or without Tiger, we just won't get to see him hit poor shots.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Damn!!!!! The masters won't be the same, I'm bummed
http://espn.go.com/golf/masters14/story/_/id/10709313/tiger-woods-back-surgery-pulls-masters
Well. Story suggests typical recovery is 4 1/2 months. He's got the best doctors, but that's no guarauntee.
Why won't it be the same? The Masters is The Masters with or without Tiger, we just won't get to see him hit poor shots.
FWIW - ESPN Radio was originally saying he could resume putting and chipping in 2-3 weeks. Not sure about the overall timeline.
They got the same release we did and it appears from his agent. Right now what is known is that is the case. He can resume chipping in a couple of weeks.
On the plus side...if all he can work on is chipping and putting for a while, those are what he was showing need for practice.
On the plus side...if all he can work on is chipping and putting for a while, those are what he was showing need for practice.
Agree with this statement. But look out if he gets back to his old self. He will be putting lights out again in no time.
Thought this post belong in here; is anyone else tiring of Haney constantly talking about Tiger? On twitter, interviews, golf.com headlines, he always has an opinion, then tries to relate it back to when he was Tiger's coach. It seems to me he is milking that coaching relationship as long as he can. I mean, in his book, Haney whines how much Tiger kept him at a distance and wouldn't give him popsicles, but then he never passes up a chance to claim how much intimate insight he has into Tiger in general. Enough already. And I like Haney. I think he's a great teacher, but move on please.
I still enjoy what he has to say. I did think those popsicle stories were silly in the book, but overall I loved hearing about TW's practice habits and how they worked together. I think he brings some good insight. Much better than Chamblee or just about anyone else that tries to talk Tiger.
Thinking about how tiger is going to manage a return, he should work with this guy as a means to help protect his back.
http://www.golfdigest.com/golf-instruction/2010-03/save-your-back-foley
That's an interesting move by Captain Watson.
Not so much about this post, more of just expanding off this post. I get more tired of people defending Tiger like he is their brother or best friend, myself! Someone says a disparaging word about Tiger and the defenders come out like wildfire. Someone says something about Sabatini and everyone starts laughing and joking. Not that I care about Sabatini!Thought this post belong in here; is anyone else tiring of Haney constantly talking about Tiger? On twitter, interviews, golf.com headlines, he always has an opinion, then tries to relate it back to when he was Tiger's coach. It seems to me he is milking that coaching relationship as long as he can. I mean, in his book, Haney whines how much Tiger kept him at a distance and wouldn't give him popsicles, but then he never passes up a chance to claim how much intimate insight he has into Tiger in general. Enough already. And I like Haney. I think he's a great teacher, but move on please.
Not so much about this post, more of just expanding off this post. I get more tired of people defending Tiger like he is their brother or best friend, myself! Someone says a disparaging word about Tiger and the defenders come out like wildfire. Someone says something about Sabatini and everyone starts laughing and joking. Not that I care about Sabatini!
JB I think your friend at The Globe and I were in the same journalism classes!!PGG,
You are dead right about a lot of that. Sadly, its the way the "media" covers the game. Years ago I was told a lot of wise things by a guy that I respect in the media that has been writing for the Boston Globe forever. He said two rules you have to go against. Stop trying to beat the story to be the story and never try to create the story when there isn't is one.
Too many "media" members do both of those things and in this day and age, with no repercussions its just "whoops we got that one wrong" or "well people want to hear it". Bullsh!t. No they dont, it's regurgitated stuff that has been played out, but the lack of creativity is evident.