My bad if this was brought up before but the new Golf Digest issue with Paulina Gretzky on the cover is getting a lot talk-good and bad. I can see why they did it but personally not a fan of it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I'm sure I will be in the minority of this one. But from the neck up, she does nothing for me. Kind of like Holly Saunders.
I'm sure I will be in the minority of this one. But from the neck up, she does nothing for me. Kind of like Holly Saunders.
I am not a big fan of this decision, nor when they did similar with Holly Saunders. I guess they are targeting a specific demographic to move a few more copies, but seems like a risk of alienating quite a few female subscribers. If the intent of the female is to show fitness, could they not have found an attractive LPGA tour player to highlight instead?
I'm sure I will be in the minority of this one. But from the neck up, she does nothing for me. Kind of like Holly Saunders.
At least Holly Saunders is a legitimate golfer and is on the golf channel. Paulina is simply the daughter of Wayne Gretzky and dating a PGA Tour player. She has no other ties to golf than Dustin Johnson.
I just think there are so many other choices they could have went with besides Paulina. As someone else mentioned though, it's getting talked about and that in the end is increasing the exposure for the magazine.
Didn't ESPN recently use a couple of LPGA golfers in a body paint shoot? I believe that Suzann Pettersen was one of them and certainly Golf Digest could have used this as an opportunity to promote the fitness from within the LPGA.
Clearly they were just hoping to bring back the people who ditched them for passing off the TaylorMade sales flier as the 2014 Hot List