This still bugs me. Without getting into whether he did it or not, there is a presumption of innocence in this country. We are all innocent of any crime until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt as determined by a jury of our peers.
That used to be true, until our country morphed into one giant reality TV show culture. Although I don't know for sure, I suspect that if the FBI were investigating someone back in say, the early 60s, they wouldn't have done a press release saying "hey, were investigating this guy." But I guess they do now. And once that's out there, we have a 'journalistic' culture to not only report on it 24/7 for days, sometimes weeks, but then, what seems like a majority of journalism is currently hell bent on damning anyone who is rich, especially wall street people. Think about it, when was the last time you heard the phrase "Koch Brothers" in a positive light? Prior to stepping down as CEO, Bill Gates was constantly under media scrutiny, but now that he's given up a chunk of his fortune and primarily retired, he has turned into a media favorite with his charitable work. No one brings up his years of lawsuits for alleged antitrust violations, the multiple class actions lawsuits over all of us having to purchase windows with our PC, etc.
As a lawyer, although I'm not a white collar federal criminal lawyer, I do know that usually, a person is aware of an investigation pretty early on by the Feds. The Feds just aren't that sneaky when they want your financial information. I think it's beyond 'low class' to approach a guy after he gets done with his job for the day. I also find it astounding that his lawyer(s) were not on top of this to prevent it from being a media circus.
If Phil isn't guilty of anything, I hope he (meaning his lawyers) puts the Feds in their place. But even if he does, the majority of media won't report it beyond a 10 second soundbite or a 1 paragraph side bar newspaper article. The damage to his reputation is already done.
~Rock
I almost completely agree with your statement. My only point of contention would be the "low class" of when/where he was approached (As a cop I must find some reason to disagree with a lawyer). I often meet with suspects and witnesses after they get home from work and if absolutely necessary at work. PGA pro or pipe fitter makes no difference to me.
But to the main point of your post, you are completely correct that the media often interferes with ones presumption of innocence. Of course history tells us this happened even in the grand ol days of newspapers.
Finally, many people are questioned every day by all sorts of law enforcement. This doesn't mean anything other than there is reason to believe someone MAY have some knowledge the investigator is looking for (and sometimes the person being questioned doesn't even know they know).