Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I am not fat, but a little extra you might say, and I have a hard time keeping the shirt tucked in. What would be nice is that shirts made to be untucked were acceptable. With that said, I don't have issues with dress codes and play at many private courses where rules are usually present.I’m fine with them except for the tucked in shirt rule. I’m a fat dude and we tend to look worse and sloppier with a tucked in shirt. Not to mention that’s it’s usually untucked by the third hole on its own
Kind of off topic, but I'm in a similar boat, and adidas golf shorts have changed my life. The logos around the inner waistband are almost like a rubber. It grips your shirt and holds it in place during the swing.I am not fat, but a little extra you might say, and I have a hard time keeping the shirt tucked in. What would be nice is that shirts made to be untucked were acceptable. With that said, I don't have issues with dress codes and play at many private courses where rules are usually present.
The golf course is pretty much the only place I ever wear a collared shirt. I’m a very casual dresser everywhere else, but I don’t object to putting on a polo, a decent pair of shorts and a belt to play golf.If it wasn’t for golf I would have been in sweatpants pretty much all of the last 12 months... I look forward to actually wearing something these days that requires a belt.
That’s the funniest part of the debate.In this case, the person knew what they were signing up for. Private club with a known dress code...
I'm curious, what is the difference? Why can't the muni (attempt to) foster the same atmosphere as the high end club?They don't bother me, but I think it's a bit silly at times. Forcing someone to wear a polo shirt for a $20 municipal course to just go out and have fun is pretty ridiculous. I understand clubs and more prestigious courses, though even that is a bit over the top at times.
I agree - there’s a big difference when it’s a known code and some people obviously take it quite seriously.That’s the funniest part of the debate.
I’m not tucking in my shirt for our epic confrontation.I've been a part of an interesting debate on social this evening about dress codes and I am blown away by how many people are genuinely bothered by them. Some have gone so far as to say that dress codes (or at least adhering to them) are what's wrong with golf, and hinders growth.
Curious to know how you feel about it, and whether your course selection (to play or to belong) is impacted by their dress code policy.
It just never made sense to me that you're forced to wear clothing that likely costs two or three times more than the activity itself. Golf is expensive enough as it is.I'm curious, what is the difference? Why can't the muni (attempt to) foster the same atmosphere as the high end club?
I'll tuck mine in to balance it out.I’m not tucking in my shirt for our epic confrontation.
So, it's more selective?I absolutely support dress codes.......to an extent. Examples: no jeans, no cargo shorts, shirts must have a collar. Now on the other hand the fact the so many people get all bent out of shape about a "golf brand specific hoodie" blows my mind. I can understand a dress code for collegiate type or distasteful hoodies. But, a golf hoodie? Cmon