GenErr
Well-known member
I think a person is maturing when they realize that looks are secondary to performance - in life, as well as in most other things including golf!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I have think as golfer we are more visual in the initial stages of a club purchase. And later the performance of said club comes into play
What if company just released stats on a club prior to the pictures. Would we still buy? I know the answer so but I'm sure there are a few exceptions.
What I really want to know is when does 'look' trump 'performance'? When do we sacrifice the latest and greatest for the less favorable performer ie. Cleveland Altitudes. The only person that doesn't benefit from these clubs is Wareagle. But everyone else that has hit them, hits them well. Now these clubs look like a set of hammers to some but produce these wonderful ball flight with the feel of a standard iron. This isn't a pitch to play ugly clubs but a question as to when do you let 'looks' go and start performing.
Don't get me wrong you can have both but most golfer really can't.
Good points dude. And you're right, style trumps all when it comes to shoes. Simple as that!
I forgot my "golf shoes" one morning and had to wear my sneakers/tennis shoes. I've been wearing them ever since. There very comfy! I haven't had any slipping issues either. So I guess I use whatever works.You guys would seriously wear shoes that hurt your feet just because they looked good???
That is retarded IMO. How am I in the minority here?
You guys would seriously wear shoes that hurt your feet just because they looked good???
That is retarded IMO. How am I in the minority here?
You guys would seriously wear shoes that hurt your feet just because they looked good???
That is retarded IMO. How am I in the minority here?
I have think as golfer we are more visual in the initial stages of a club purchase. And later the performance of said club comes into play
What if company just released stats on a club prior to the pictures. Would we still buy? I know the answer so but I'm sure there are a few exceptions.
What I really want to know is when does 'look' trump 'performance'? When do we sacrifice the latest and greatest for the less favorable performer ie. Cleveland Altitudes. The only person that doesn't benefit from these clubs is Wareagle. But everyone else that has hit them, hits them well. Now these clubs look like a set of hammers to some but produce these wonderful ball flight with the feel of a standard iron. This isn't a pitch to play ugly clubs but a question as to when do you let 'looks' go and start performing.
Don't get me wrong you can have both but most golfer really can't.