dduarte85
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2018
- Messages
- 1,302
- Reaction score
- 387
- Handicap
- 3.9
I agree with that. I play a lot of those courses and this summer has been brutal to the ones that haven't/can't water their fairways. Many of them are baked out in spots with almost no grass. It's not terrible to play from (for me at least) when it's dry but horrific (again for me at least) when those bare spots are mud. You'll usually have a big glob of mud on the ball as well.
In order to play a lot of golf when I'm paying for 3-4 rounds at a time with the kids, we play some substandard courses. When we are on them we will generally LCP in the FW only and then only when we hit into a bare earth spot. I know it's not 100% by the rules but I don't think the rules take into full account that sometimes we play some really awful courses. When I'd rather be in the rough than on the FW, there's something wrong with that. I don't care about landing in the random divot, that stinks but it's part of the game. I'm talking about hitting into a 20'x20' patch of ground that has one usable tuft of grass every 3 feet.
Another huge factor in determining what's fair is the question "who am I cheating?" If my HC is a little bit lower because of the above, ultimately I'm only hurting myself in the event that I play a competition where HC is factored in. For anyone vehemently opposed to ever moving the ball, I'll just assume that you play nicer courses than what we do. If I could afford to play as much as we do on nicer courses where this wasn't an issue, that would be great. As it is, I'd rather golf with them 3 times a week on craptastic courses than once a week on a nice course. We still play some nicer courses too but those are usually a special event rather than the norm.
When the rules of gold were written, amended etc they were done so with real golf courses in mind. The dog tracks are just fields with flags in the ground.