- Admin
- #26
I agree here but man to purchase from them at those prices isOf those? Club Champion in a LANDSLIDE.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I agree here but man to purchase from them at those prices isOf those? Club Champion in a LANDSLIDE.
It depends on the person. But, the beauty is you get a DEEP fitting and no one is making you buy anything. Can always order elsewhere or build them out yourself.I agree here but man to purchase from them at those prices is
How about everything.I guess I'm just curious exactly what about Golftec that folks would disagree with.
I agree here but man to purchase from them at those prices is
If that is your thing, it’s your thing. I just don’t think most golfers care about all of that or think it makes much differenceThere is a reason for the prices. I think it's something most consumers just shrug off as being overpriced.
They order shafts in bulk and weight sort, frequency match and pure them. With some OEMs there isn't much work to do, like with Oban. However, with others, like KBS and Dynamic Gold, they can be all over the place as far as weight and frequency goes.
Assuming a Club Champion build is the same as an OEM build couldn't be further from the truth. OEMs build to fairly loose tolerances and simple things like grips being put on straight get overlooked. The build is just as important as the actual fitting itself. I may not agree 100% with their pricing, but I understand why they do it. I see so many clubs that come from OEMs and are remarkably off on specs.
I primarily started at Golftec to get lessons because I was VERY inconsistent at golf league, and I know I'm capable of playing better. I do feel like my coach has helped me improve and strike the ball more consistently. At this point, I'm prepaid through early to mid February.
I guess I'll consider this a learning experience and will try to make better decisions in the future.
I guess I'm just curious exactly what about Golftec that folks would disagree with.
If that is your thing, it’s your thing. I just don’t think most golfers care about all of that or think it makes much difference
Curious why some are choosing CC over True Spec. CC uses Trackman while True Spec uses GC Quad, which almost everyone agrees is better indoors.
I have two small issues with True Spec in my two fittings there.Curious why some are choosing CC over True Spec. CC uses Trackman while True Spec uses GC Quad, which almost everyone agrees is better indoors.
I have two small issues with True Spec in my two fittings there.
1. they use a software I just don’t care for.
2. Each time they really pushed brands they own.
Those are valid points. Trackman is obviously a great tool, but as you pointed out it's flawed indoors. Just seems odd they would continue down that road if there is another option that's clearly better in their fitting environment.TrackMan is fine indoors if the fitter knows what they are doing. The importance of knowing strike location with TrackMan as well as having the silver reflective dots on the golf balls in paramount. TrackMan can give some funky numbers/shot shapes sometimes because it can read face angles etc from deflection. The setup is important, but having a fitter who understands TrackMan can be the difference maker.
It's not impossible to get a great fitting indoors with a TrackMan. GC Quad is a better indoor setup, I'm not arguing that.
I've personally only been to CC so I'm not sure how those points differ from CC. I want to do a loft/lie gapping session this winter and was leaning towards True Spec mainly for the GC Quad.I have two small issues with True Spec in my two fittings there.
1. they use a software I just don’t care for.
2. Each time they really pushed brands they own.
CC doesn’t own brands.Those are valid points. Trackman is obviously a great tool, but as you pointed out it's flawed indoors. Just seems odd they would continue down that road if there is another option that's clearly better in their fitting environment. I've personally only been to CC so I'm not sure how those points differ from CC. I want to do a loft/lie gapping session this winter and was leaning towards True Spec mainly for the GC Quad.
Those are valid points. Trackman is obviously a great tool, but as you pointed out it's flawed indoors. Just seems odd they would continue down that road if there is another option that's clearly better in their fitting environment. I've personally only been to CC so I'm not sure how those points differ from CC. I want to do a loft/lie gapping session this winter and was leaning towards True Spec mainly for the GC Quad.