arwin
Active member
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2012
- Messages
- 1,221
- Reaction score
- 3
Just reading a few threads on people's opinion on spike vs spike-less and was wondering why people have the opinion that spike-less shoes are more comfortable.
I have a few pairs of spiked shoes and a pair of the spike-less shoe. I don't get the feeling that a spike-less shoe is any more or less comfortable than a spiked shoe.
I mean, the spikes are at the bottom of the shoe and should not have any bearing on how the materials fit on your feet.
I could see how walking on pavement would make the shoe feel different based on the spikes on the bottom, but that's more of an annoying clicking when walking or having a feeling of no traction on pavement with the spiked shoe.
The last of the shoe and insole of the shoe should determine if a shoe is comfortable or not and the spikes on the bottom should be irrelevant, no?
I have a few pairs of spiked shoes and a pair of the spike-less shoe. I don't get the feeling that a spike-less shoe is any more or less comfortable than a spiked shoe.
I mean, the spikes are at the bottom of the shoe and should not have any bearing on how the materials fit on your feet.
I could see how walking on pavement would make the shoe feel different based on the spikes on the bottom, but that's more of an annoying clicking when walking or having a feeling of no traction on pavement with the spiked shoe.
The last of the shoe and insole of the shoe should determine if a shoe is comfortable or not and the spikes on the bottom should be irrelevant, no?