- Moderator
- #176
Like I said, minor distraction. It annoys me that I have to go wipe it off because I'm gonna stare at it and wonder why my driver has a second degree sunburn
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You concern me.Like I said, minor distraction. It annoys me that I have to go wipe it off because I'm gonna stare at it and wonder why my driver has a second degree sunburn
You concern me.
Well, for some insane reason GBB just left Tampa this morning so it won't be making the today delivery, will have it in hand tomorrow though I'm sure.
That is honestly a scary thought. I'm Crazy eager to get this one head to head with my 815.This head with the PX LZ shaft is a bomber. I am getting slightly less spin than the 815, higher launch (same peak height) and slightly more distance. Loving seeing more launch and same peak with less spin. Dialing in should produce more distance for me.
How do you get a higher launch and the same peak. Is the ball speed lower?
So much to learn about ball activity off the face of a club
They have one for 2015 offerings at the beginning of the year...I'd guess we'd see the refresh in JanuaryAs cool as the shaft options chart looks, I would prefer Callaway do what Titleist does. Put all those wonderful shaft options on a chart with spin and launch characteristics. I think spin and launch (low, mid, high) is more important than weight.
That was more like PING's custom options. Let me better explain what I'm looking for.They have one for 2015 offerings at the beginning of the year...I'd guess we'd see the refresh in January
Pages 26 and 27 have something that's close to the titleist one...not exact but is that what you were saying was like Ping?That was more like PING's custom options. Let me better explain what I'm looking for.
For example, you're looking at two described mid launch and mid spin shafts. One would not be able to tell between the two shafts which is more on the "higher" launching of the two based on the PING or Callaway Custom Options material.
Check out the link below
http://media.titleist.com/images/ti...mctr=(not provided)&__utmv=-&__utmk=258579594
That was more like PING's custom options. Let me better explain what I'm looking for.
For example, you're looking at two described mid launch and mid spin shafts. One would not be able to tell between the two shafts which is more on the "higher" launching of the two based on the PING or Callaway Custom Options material.
Check out the link below
http://media.titleist.com/images/ti...mctr=(not provided)&__utmv=-&__utmk=258579594
I'm lucky enough to have a Cally fitting center near me. With all the shaft and adjustments this offers, a fitting session is a must
For the tech nerds out there like me, Callaway has a "white paper" about this driver on their site that is really interesting: http://cmp.callawaygolf.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/whitepaper-leave-no-yard-behind.pdf
It's full of technical details and why they designed certain features of this driver, and lists the reasons why the average amateur golfer is leaving distance on the table. The other interesting part is that they list what the average amateur does when hitting a driver: 1.44 smash factor, 11.3 degree launch angle, 3326 rpm of backspin. They also state that the numbers they feel are in reach of the average amateur are 14 degree launch angle, 2400 rpm of backspin, smash factor of 1.50 with no sidespin. It's a little different than the 17/1700 concept of a few years ago that was out there. It's a cool writeup that they did, nice to see a company go in-depth like that with the technical details of how this club came into production.
Its seriously one of the coolest things I've read from an OEM about a release.Bumping this bc there is a lot of great information on how and why they designed this head. Easy to read and very straightforward.
Its seriously one of the coolest things I've read from an OEM about a release.