Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That reaction seems a bit much.what on earth does testosterone have to do with an intellectual decision?
I have seen a lot of die it in the hole guys who are very good putters and seen a monstrous number of three putt machines with the never up never in philosophy because they run it well past the hole and have a 50/50 or worse putt coming back. Blow it 8' past and "at least I gave it a chance".
No...no you didn't. A putt at that speed has a miniscule strike location to drop. It is far more likely to rim out and shoot off several feet in a random direction than drop.
Statistically speaking, studies have shown that the optimal capture speed for the hole is at most 6" past which is much closer to "die it in" than run it past.
Unless you are saying people with testosterone are stupid and it is somehow better to 3-putt than 2-putt with a tap in for the second?
Not going to lie, that "never up never in" is literally the only piece of trash talk that has worked against me in any sport and took me a long time to get to where I ignore the guy who used it. Along with "never leave an eagle putt short" and a host of other equally ignorant "advice".
I like to think the proper speed for any golfer is the one that puts the ball in the hole in the fewest number of strokes which has zero correlation with testosterone, estrogen or the alignment of the planets in conjunction with the phase of the moon in the second phase on the third Thursday after the first fall harvest after leap year.
Food for thought when you are putting. Do you like to "die" your putts into the hole or do you like think you can run it past the 6 inches or foot past the hole.
I like that thinking...I think I do anyhow.I believe most consistently good putters lag-die their long putts but inside 15 feet their miss is past the hole.
I like that thinking...I think I do anyhow.
what on earth does testosterone have to do with an intellectual decision?
I have seen a lot of die it in the hole guys who are very good putters and seen a monstrous number of three putt machines with the never up never in philosophy because they run it well past the hole and have a 50/50 or worse putt coming back. Blow it 8' past and "at least I gave it a chance".
No...no you didn't. A putt at that speed has a miniscule strike location to drop. It is far more likely to rim out and shoot off several feet in a random direction than drop.
Statistically speaking, studies have shown that the optimal capture speed for the hole is at most 6" past which is much closer to "die it in" than run it past.
Unless you are saying people with testosterone are stupid and it is somehow better to 3-putt than 2-putt with a tap in for the second?
Not going to lie, that "never up never in" is literally the only piece of trash talk that has worked against me in any sport and took me a long time to get to where I ignore the guy who used it. Along with "never leave an eagle putt short" and a host of other equally ignorant "advice".
I like to think the proper speed for any golfer is the one that puts the ball in the hole in the fewest number of strokes which has zero correlation with testosterone, estrogen or the alignment of the planets in conjunction with the phase of the moon in the second phase on the third Thursday after the first fall harvest after leap year.
This.Depends on the putt I suppose. If it’s shorter with minimal break I might try to hit the break out meaning it’ll obviously roll by if missed, but if it has a lot of break I’ll die it in as it makes the area to roll it in wider in my mind.
Bad putts with the right speed leave you a lot of tap-ins and stress-free 2 putts.I try to die it at the hole. Bad putts with the right speed aren't so bad