rghilljr
Active member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2012
- Messages
- 1,483
- Reaction score
- 14
- Handicap
- 13
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There are multiple ways to look at it and not everyone is going to agree with either.
One one side, there is a boys team and a girls team. So, it could be argued that she shouldn't be allowed on the boys team. And, the "girls have been allowed to play football" arguement is not valid here, IMO. It's not "the boys football team". It's just "football team". There is no male/female designation.
You wrote this as I was writing mine. I have to disagree with this statement for two reasons. One is that since football is obviously a sport with bigger boys playing, faster and stronger and it is a contact sport, emphasis on contact, most girls cannot physically compete on the same field as the boys and thus there is not as much interest by the girls to play the sport, thus the following logic is that is why there is not a division between boys and girls in this sport at this time in high school. It's never been an option. In this case, there were not enough girls to sign up, so there is NO girls team, which makes the boys team the only golf team, thus by definition becoming "The Golf Team", not to boys golf team. If there were a current distinction between the boys and girls golf team, then I would say she should play with the girls even though she may be able to compete with the boys. .. Until that time, it renders the argument of girls/boys football moot since there is only one option. At this school, this year, there is only one option for golf as well.
You are probably right as well, that there was some kid who can barely get the ball off of the tee who didn't make the team and now his parents are crying. My advice is, get better than the number 10 kid on the team (assuming 5 var and 5 jv) and go out and make the team.
There's a term for situations where we allow ourselves to be confined by an "OR" decision - the fools choice. The better approach is to find ways to give yourself an "AND" decision.
In this case, the decision precludes two girls and one boy from playing golf, so I don't like it. They should have granted a waiver allowing the school to field a 3 person girls team. This would have allowed for the most participation, avoided the gender based controversy and given the school extra time to recruit a 4th player.
You cannot have a 3 person golf team. Team scoring in golf is based on the lowest 4 scores out of 5 players. At a minimun you must have 4 players on a team.
Take the lowest two scores and have the highest score used twice. Ive seen it done.
That seems exploitable to me.
Golf is in individual sport which can be set up for team play. Football is a team sport. One cannot play football as an individual. If not enough kids try out for a football team, there is no opportunity for you to play. You must have 11 kids suit up. In this girl's situation, there was not enough girls signed up for "a formal team". But, she could still compete for the girls individual competitions.
I am not for/against either solution. I am merely playing devil's advocate. From what I can tell, the verbiage clearly designates girl's team and boy's team. If there isn't enough players for a girl's team, then, in golf, you would/could still compete for the girl's individual trophies and championships.
Take the lowest two scores and have the highest score used twice. Ive seen it done.
Well in my hometown the score being used twice was usually in the 100's so its not as cut and dry as a team with a 2.2 handicap and two 7 handicaps, but I have seen it done.
If she is playing by the same rules as all of her male competitors it shouldn't be an issue. There have been females play in a PGA Tour event so this shouldn't be any different to me IMO
I agree with that point. And arguments can obviously be made for both sides. I've just always personally felt that if the girl can compete with the boys on the boys playing field, then let her have at it. If she can't cut it, she won't make the team. In this case, she has already proven not only can she cut it, she can help carry the team to a title.
I agree. Regardless of boy/girl designation, a coach should be given the opportunity to field the best team.
Maybe h.s.golf championships need to eliminate the boys & girls designation from the title, and go to something more akin to back/middle/forward tees.
Blue Team (varsity best regardless of boy or girl)
White Team (like the JV regardless of boy or girl)
Red Team (freshmen or those who can't break 100, regardless or boy or girl)
The problem with letting girls on the boys team is that the girls won't let boys on their team. Maybe the above idea eliminates that situation, at least for golf. Don't ask me about baseball/softball or gymnastics.
I agree. Regardless of boy/girl designation, a coach should be given the opportunity to field the best team.
Maybe h.s.golf championships need to eliminate the boys & girls designation from the title, and go to something more akin to back/middle/forward tees.
Blue Team (varsity best regardless of boy or girl)
White Team (like the JV regardless of boy or girl)
Red Team (freshmen or those who can't break 100, regardless or boy or girl)
The problem with letting girls on the boys team is that the girls won't let boys on their team. Maybe the above idea eliminates that situation, at least for golf. Don't ask me about baseball/softball or gymnastics.