PING G30 Driver Review

Bridging the gap between traditional and unique with forgiveness and distance in mind, the Ping G30 will be certain to turn a few heads.  With intriguing sound, fresh design elements, and a storied history of quality through the G series, it comes as no surprise the next installment in this line performs admirably.  For this review, the 9 degree G30 head with the Tour 65 stiff shaft was utilized.

Click on each picture for larger image
Click on each picture for larger image

Turbulators

From Ping: To generate faster clubhead speed and ball velocity for longer drives, turbulators were engineered onto the crown of the 460cc head. Proven in wind-tunnel testing to reduce aerodynamic drag and create efficient airflow, the added speed from the turbulators provides measurable distance gains for all skill levels. At address, they create a captured appearance with the ball and assist with alignment and inspiration.

pic2

The first and likely most notable design element of the Ping G30 are the turbulators, which sit on the crown of the driver. Ping notes the added design element reduces the ‘drag forces’ through the contact area of the swing, which can help to increase club head speed.  While the swing speed of the Ping did not out perform a variety of other drivers side by side, the turbulators did a tremendous job aligning to the ball on setup.  Not only did the head frame the ball extremely well, it was quite clear where the ball was located at address in relation to the club head. 

pic3

A fair commentary would suggest the turbulators are ‘extreme’ or ‘non-traditional’ in design, and it is not unfair to make that claim, however over the course of testing, not only did they stop being obtrusive to the eye thanks to the matte black finish, they became extremely beneficial for squaring the ball to the target and clubface.

Hotter Face Material

From Ping: A new high-strength, lightweight T9S titanium face is thinner and hotter to optimize face deflection for faster ball speeds and longer drives.

pic4

It is very exciting to see companies introduce lighter weight technology, as it adds to the flexibility of moving weight to more beneficial places on the head, not to mention producing greater technology potential in each area of the club head.  In this case, while it’s nearly impossible to translate face contact and release with the naked eye, the performance of the G30 rivaled a majority, if not all drivers on the market in terms of total carry distance.

pic5

While very subjective, the ball did appear to ‘jump’ off the G30 on well struck drives.  Discussion of sound and launch will come shortly, however it is worth acknowledging that what appeared to be ‘flush’ contact was consistently at or better than expected results.

Low-Back CG

From Ping: Weight savings from thinning the face are allocated to help position the CG lower and farther back than any PING driver to date, ensuring high launch and optimized spin with a high MOI for extreme forgiveness.

pic6

When one considers the elongated profile of the G30 from the face to the back section of the driver head, it comes at little surprise that they were afforded the ability to drive the CG lower and away from the face.  It is with this design that very notable forgiveness was provided, especially on shots lower and towards the heel.  While extreme scenarios of inaccuracy (nearly to the crown high on the face) produced notable distance losses, a majority of the mediocre swings imparted on the G30 generated more than ideal results.  This includes both distance and accuracy off target line.

pic7

While this design structure suggests a ‘high’ launch profile, testing confirmed that launch can be tamed based on the adjustability of the head along with shaft selection.  Testing all but proved there are optimal low to low/mid solutions to the G30 stock setup.

5-Setting Adjustability

From Ping: To optimize the performance of your driver and maximize carry distance and roll out, you can fine-tune launch angle and spin by adding or subtracting up to 1 degree of loft prior to your round. Settings are standard, +0.6°, +1°, -0.6°, or -1°.

The G30 showed markedly different results between the two loft extremes provided by the trajectory tuning+ technology adapter:  the 8 degree setting for lower, more penetrating ball flight, all the way up to the high launching 10 degree setting.  With five adjustments possible between two degrees of driver face loft, users have the freedom to get exactly what they are looking for in launch characteristics.

pic8

Overall Impressions

While there were many considerations during the G30 testing, a few of the more common questions will be addressed in the following paragraphs.  To begin with a very popular question, the sound of the G30 is quite unique.  It’s not overly obnoxious or traditional in response, but rather something quite its own.  The T9S face, along with the depth of the head produce a higher pitched, yet muted sound.  It’s not to suggest it would take a long time to dial in the sound of the G30, however it does provide itself something unique beyond looks.

Forgiveness is very subjective, however testing would suggest the G30 is extremely easy to hit on the center or near the center of the face, and as such promote consistently straight drives.  Contact low and well inside towards the heel did not show a great deal of distance reduction, and a similar result was experienced with contact slightly higher than center and towards the toe.  With the CG built back into the head and lower, Ping claims a reduction of the overall gear effect and testing provided that to be quite true.   For greater depth on face forgiveness and distance variances on contact, consider this post on the THP Forums.

pic9

While forgiveness is incredibly beneficial with a driver, distance plays a major role on relevance and the G30 proved to be exceptional in that regard.  Testing confirmed carry distances well within expectations, with some situations actually overachieving.  With reasonably firm fairways it’s quite likely the G30 will roll out nicely, however in this case a majority of the testing was completed on soft fairways, which did not produce additional rollout.  Based on carry and launch conditions, it’s realistic to expect some rollout with the G30 on the optimal setting.

Early stages of testing did prove interesting when moving to the G30 from a more traditional driver headshape.  Between the turbulators, matte black finish, and longer (from face to back) head design, it did take two or three outings to familiarize with the profile.  With that in mind, golfers have the ability to define what they believe to be the ‘norm’ based on what they game, and it would not take long to get comfortable with this head shape. 

pic10

With regards to the matte black finish, it is an excellent look.  Zero sun glare is a major benefit, although it can be a small source of frustration for anyone attempting to golf in the morning dew, as water changes the finish to a dark black.  Anyone carrying a towel with them can quickly wipe down the driver for a return to standard coloration within a handful of seconds.

Experiences can vary with the Ping G30 driver depending on the shaft incorporated with the head, however the Tour 65 stiff shaft came as advertised – low-mid in flight.  The launch angle can easily change based on the head adjustability, however in optimal settings the low-mid flight was achieved more often than not.  This shaft plays at 45.25 inches in the G30 head, unlike the stock TFC 419D which plays at 45.75 inches.

pic11

After a great deal of time spent with the G30, testing confirmed Ping’s claims of being a solid performance driver without the loss of forgiveness.  With a large sweet spot, alignment aiding top line, and impressive face construction, the Ping G30 rivals most stock options available today.  Thanks to a variety of stock shaft options available, it is realistic to believe the G30 can perform for a variety of golfers.   For more information on the Ping G30 driver, visit www.Ping.com.

Follow, Like & Share
Instagram
Twitter
Visit Us
Follow Me
YouTube
YouTube
LinkedIn
Share

Dan E.
Dan Edwards is a THP staff writer that currently resides in southern Ohio. He is a low index player that has a long-held love for taking in and sharing knowledge about golf equipment.
There are no products in your cart.