What pops into your mind when someone says, “hybrid irons”?
Personally, my mind immediately goes to Cleveland Golf. For years now it feels like no one has been as invested in the idea of hybrid irons as Cleveland. In fact, you might even say that in 2012 the 588 Altitudes kicked the door down for the brand in this category, and since then, they have been a committed proponent and innovator of such irons.
Now though, the name of that game for them is Halo XL, and this year they are going Full-Face.

Quick Take
Sure, there is a lot to look at when it comes to the Halo XL Full-Face irons, but as big and in your face as their progressive hollow body size can be, there is an equal amount of fun. With a more streamlined look and better blend of offset, they are the perfect platform for Cleveland to bring the full-face look to irons. Most importantly, they are about as easy to hit high and consistent as you will ever find. They go a long way to making the game more enjoyable.
Cleveland Halo XL Full-Face Irons – Technology Rundown
When you lead new irons with the tagline, “Get Better with Bigger”, then it leaves one with a pretty good notion of what they are about to experience in a golf club. You see, big is exactly the point here, and that all starts with Cleveland’s “XL Head Design”.

The notion behind the XL Head Design not only fits in with all the other releases under the Halo XL umbrella in which bigger means more confidence inspiring, but also in the case of these hollow body irons it means the ability to push boundaries. The size is exactly what is allowing Cleveland to push the limits of perimeter weighting and forgiveness, and within those baselines they have packed the rest with more tech than one would ever expect.

It is within that framework which Cleveland has been able to implement the use of unique weight pads which allow precise placements as well as their “MainFrame Face”, both of which have been driven by the company’s application of AI. The decision to implement AI was an easy one for the brand as it has thousands of simulations which have taken place, testing reactions to the misses which amateurs experience the most.

In the end, Cleveland says they found a blend of increased COR as well as MOI compared to the previous versions of the Halo XL irons. The aforementioned weight pads vary based on which club in the progressive set you are discussing. The MainFrame Face on the other hand uses variable thickness as well as a much expanded sweet spot which runs beyond center mass, extending to the higher toe as well as lower heel section.

That same face is indeed using the brands breakthrough “HydraZip” technology that applies a face blasting system with the lower lofts (4i-7i) being rougher to minimize excess spin for more carry, and the higher lofts (8i-SW) slightly smoother for more spin consistency. If that wasn’t enough, Cleveland has also made the iron grooves Full-Face, adding up to 20% more hitting area, providing a potential boon for the type of golfer most likely to play these.

The progressive nature of the Halo XL has historically been focused primarily on profile, and that is the case here as well, there is also a Three Sole design across the set. The understanding by Cleveland is that this is a set about needs, and for the amateur seeking forgiveness, that changes drastically through a set. So, the long irons (4i-7i) have a full GlideRail design like the Halo XL hybrids allowing better interaction for sweepers. The short clubs (8i-9i) have a V-Shaped Sole which aids hitting down and not digging. Finally, the wedges (PW-SW) use a Three Tiered Sole that brings a combination of bounce and versatility to the set.

All of this is tied up in a bow with the use of Action Mass CB alongside the rest of the 2024 lineup from Cleveland. There is an 8g counterweight placed underneath the grip in the butt end of each golf club in the set. Counterbalance has been long proven to help aid sequencing and thus consistency for amateurs, not to mention the ability to create speed. As you can see, there is no shortage of technology built into these large irons.

Cleveland Halo XL Full-Face Irons – Performance Review
This article, however, is not simply a tech breakdown for a new release. No, THP was able to get 5, 7, and 9 irons from the Halo XL Full-Face set in hand to see just how they perform as well. Yes, they are big, bold, absolutely in your face, and are not going to be everyone’s cup of tea, but, they aren’t intended to be. They take aim at the group seeking maximum forgiveness and playability, and are willing to let go of looks in its favor.

Even with that in mind, I have to say, I don’t think the looks are bad. While they aren’t my preferred profile, I was thoroughly impressed with this latest evolution visually. In fact, this is the closest to the 588 Altitudes I can remember in look, size, shaping, and offset. Some of you might be wondering how that is a compliment, well, those are the gold standard in taking ultra forgiving and making them palatable in my books. Here, there is much of that DNA, from the oversized almost full hybrid like long irons, to the surprisingly normal looking wedges.

I won’t sit here and try to convince you that these are the best looking things ever, but I will tell you that they let you get away with some pretty terrible swings. It was interesting to get such a varying taste of each because they are so drastically different, yet flow. The 5 iron has a very low face height to it and with the extra thick topline into the HiBore cavity it looks similar to a full hybrid, where the 7 and 9 irons increase each in depth while becoming a traditional game-improvement size.

At impact, the sound changes almost as much as the profiles do, with the 5 iron being the most hollow in its resonance while the other two irons kept a nice crisp metallic leaning feedback that reminded me a lot of the new Halo XL hybrids. It should be of no surprise that given the size, the feedback stays quite similar on strikes across the face. Along with the consistency was some of the highest stability that I have seen in some time, a night and day difference compared to my typical players cavity style irons to be sure.

On the course and off, it was fun to experience two of the three different sole styles within the set as the 5 iron has the full GlideRail setup and the 7 as well as the 9 irons use the V-Shaped sole. Given how big and shallow the 5 irons is, the rails activate easily since there is a natural tendency to want to sweep that one compared to the others. Just as I have seen with the Halo XL hybrids GlideRails, they bring as much versatility to shots in the muck and mire as they do in aiding a gliding sensation on tight lies. As for the V-Shaped irons, I brought a variety of descending angle-of-attacks to work them out and the more aggressive I got, the better they responded. I was quite surprised at how playable the wider soles of the 7 and 9 were, in fact I never anticipated I’d have been able to get that aggressive.

As you can see in the data recorded and placed throughout this section, the Halo XL Full-Face irons are also long. I anticipated more distance, but not as much as I saw. Yes, part of that is them being paired with lighter graphite shafts for testing (UST Helium Nanocore 60), but even then, the clubheads have to maintain efficiency. In the 9 iron there is a level of normalcy at setup and in feedback as well, it’s not outlandish in size so there was an ability to hone in on dialing shots. That said, it was still really hot faced regardless on where my strikes were landing.

Speaking of using the face, as I worked into the 5 and 7 irons I began using more of that surface area as admittedly timing things up shaft wise was something I had to work at since speed wise I’m not the exact demographic for the shaft pairing. But, even in that I saw the things I needed to, and for Cleveland Golf’s sake hoped I would. They want to go. Even when I was working things out onto the toe of the 5 iron, it seemed to fight the twisting, which of course is thanks to the hollow design.

All three of the irons showed enough of themselves to illustrate the blend of needs for golfers like Cleveland Golf intended. The 9 iron brought incredible descents and the ability to take dead aim, things were similar with the 7 iron and despite the somewhat lower spin, descent angles keeping in that 50 degree realm means they will hold greens. As for the 5 iron, I will openly admit that I struggled here a bit in timing because of the setup, as my swing speed began to really go, I fought timing the face. Even so, the things you hope to see for the type of golfer who will fit into these were there, power and speed in a long iron making it possible to get to the green even if you are missing.

For those wondering, the lofts this time around on the Halo XL’s are one degree stronger (5 – 23.0, 7 – 29.0, 9 – 38.0, set plays off a PW – 43.0), but before some of you clinch your fists, both the oversized hollow-body/hybrid iron design allows for that. More importantly the new MainFrame face and its speeds make it necessary to hit proper windows and maximize blending through the set. The faces are no doubt the stars, with the Full-Face being surprisingly perfect for this style in looks and performance, not to mention the HyrdraZip brings incredible consistency despite these not implementing ZipCore. The bottom line is these remain in a class of their own, literally and physically.
The Details
Cleveland Golf is making their new Halo XL Full-Face irons available for pre-order starting 1/15/24 and at retail on 1/19/24. The irons will come standard with either UST Mamiya Helium Nanocore (60 in men’s, 50 in women’s) or KBS Tour Lite. There are as always, a ton of custom options available through Cleveland and they have even designed the irons to be able to be bent for fitting as well as a custom “Accuracy Build” which is ½” shorter and without the counter-balance.
The Halo XL Full-Face irons are available in 4-PW and SW, the price for a 7-piece setup will be $899.99 for steel and $999.99 for graphite. Check out more details at us.dunlopsports.com/cleveland-golf.
Another awesome write up James. While I don’t think I am quite ready to consider this extreme, I love that Cleveland continues to put out quality, technologically-advanced clubs with all skill levels in mind.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12076676, member: 1579″]
I’ve never hit the 799’s, sorry
[/QUOTE]
no apology necessary, Jman
just interested in the form factor…they’ve been reviewed favorably to earlier Cleveland Halo versions…
[MEDIA=youtube]dzuR72jY6Js:21[/MEDIA]
I like my Halo XLs, but I wonder if I would be better served by a smaller head club. Wouldn’t turf interaction be less with a smaller head club? Maybe less club turn on impact?
Just thinking out loud. Oh, covers are for sissies.
[QUOTE=”ULEWZ, post: 12079529, member: 52804″]
I like my Halo XLs, but I wonder if I would be better served by a smaller head club. Wouldn’t turf interaction be less with a smaller head club? Maybe less club turn on impact?
Just thinking out loud. Oh, covers are for sissies.
[/QUOTE]
Depends on the swing, for some smaller heads could also mean more digging. There is no hard and fast answer.
Thank you for the write up. My dad rocked the originals, never did swing them because he was a lefty. I have always wanted to try them out.
Good review, this guy has such an easy swing, like Tom Watson.
[MEDIA=youtube]0Pno_xdFu3Q[/MEDIA]
[MEDIA=youtube]hMQFNp5q9H4[/MEDIA]
[QUOTE=”Thrillbilly Jim, post: 12098564, member: 50607″]
[MEDIA=youtube]hMQFNp5q9H4[/MEDIA]
[/QUOTE]
Good video on these!
I’ve always enjoyed this style of club myself. Usually get good result from them but our son doesn’t believe I need this much help?? he’ll get age on him one of the days. I’m on the fence of a set of these or a set of the Cleveland MAX… why the Max isn’t getting any coverage is beyond me, especially at the price point they are available at!
[QUOTE=”boggyman, post: 12100492, member: 39404″]
It’s new. I like that the lofts aren’t jacked! They’re just overshadowed but at the price point there hard to overlook!
[/QUOTE]
They look nice and a great price. The top line has a Callaway look to them, the rest is Cleveland. It would be nice to blend a Halo set with these. I love the hybrid irons, but, less so on the 8, 9, W.
Saw the Halo XL FF’s in PGA SS. Based on feel, I didn’t see much difference between them and the Launcher XL Halo’s prior gen. They only had the Gap wedge (formally D wedge) to hit and that thing is so clunky, I don’t that’s a fair representation. But, with that said, it didn’t feel great. We’ll see if the full face will make a difference in the future for off center hits. That maybe a positive. Also, it seems to have a slightly firmer shaft & weight. Looking forward to hitting these on a demo day to get a true test. At least, here’s some early feedback and a pic.
Didn’t have time to hit but my local shop had these. I brought my measuring tape and the 7i and DW (only two I measured) were pretty much smack on the same size / profile as the previous gen halo. I was hoping for a slightly shorter blade and especially smaller wedges.
[ATTACH=full]9239558[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]9239559[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]9239559[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]9239561[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]9239562[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]9239563[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]9239564[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]9239565[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]9239566[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]9239567[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]9239568[/ATTACH]
I wasn’t blown away by the looks of these this year. The full face grooves are a nice touch that ties in with the CBX4 and Smart Sole wedges. The rails on the bottom look to be less pronounced to give a cleaner look, but also looks to be less affective because of this. Very reminiscent of the Turbo Launcher look.
As someone who plays the CBX full face, the Halo FF is not even noticeable to me. I like that they dropped the blue trim. I like the UST shaft with the added weight. I would need the custom paint job and paint the white writing black.
I have to go hit these on Monday as they’re in my local golf shop. I could see myself walking out with them tomorrow, stay tuned.
I do miss my Halos from last year.
[QUOTE=”Hacker67, post: 12121660, member: 71565″]
As someone who plays the CBX full face, the Halo FF is not even noticeable to me. I like that they dropped the blue trim. I like the UST shaft with the added weight. I would need the custom paint job and paint the white writing black.
I have to go hit these on Monday as they’re in my local golf shop. I could see myself walking out with them tomorrow, stay tuned.
I do miss my Halos from last year.
[/QUOTE]
Let us know how it goes.
Anyone that played the prior Cleveland hybrid irons try these yet?
I got out yesterday for my first 9 holes of 2024 yesterday. I played well +4 39 with a triple bogey. Doh lol
But didn’t hit my irons all that well. Chipping and putter bailed me out.
I went to the range today and brought my HB turbo 6i to compare against my 6i and my 6h and the turbo worked best for me. Always seems to be the case and everytime I break out my old altitude irons from the basement I play well. I like to hit a gentle draw and the Cleveland hybrid irons always deliver with the baby draw. To where with other irons I can usually draw them but sometimes struggle in that department with the 7 and 6i slot.
[QUOTE=”erock9174, post: 12134162, member: 7797″]
Anyone that played the prior Cleveland hybrid irons try these yet?
I got out yesterday for my first 9 holes of 2024 yesterday. I played well +4 39 with a triple bogey. Doh lol
But didn’t hit my irons all that well. Chipping and putter bailed me out.
I went to the range today and brought my HB turbo 6i to compare against my 6i and my 6h and the turbo worked best for me. Always seems to be the case and everytime I break out my old altitude irons from the basement I play well. I like to hit a gentle draw and the Cleveland hybrid irons always deliver with the baby draw. To where with other irons I can usually draw them but sometimes struggle in that department with the 7 and 6i slot.
[/QUOTE]
So what is gonna name the bag iron wise? New FF or???
Had a chance to hit a few of these the other day and, although they looked kind of weird, they strike very solid and are quite easy to hit. If one has the ability to apply a hunk of metal to a ball with this gear it’s a given the ball will fly. Don’t use new gear but these would be in the hunt if I did.
I’ve played with standard length HB Launchers for 5-6 years. I love them, but at 69 years, I’ve lost distance. Thinking of getting fitted with longer shafts (6’4″). Im hoping that a longer shaft along with the counterbalance will help. But I’ve lowered my index from 14 to 9 with these clubs. Endlessly pursuit of the unattainable
So nobody followed up with buying and how they played? I was thinking of checking these out .
[QUOTE=”Golf4man53, post: 12933201, member: 83560″]
So nobody followed up with buying and how they played? I was thinking of checking these out .
[/QUOTE]
Deja vu. I was just thinking this exact thing. FWIW, I currently have the Launcher XL Halo irons and really like them, but am trying real hard to find something better. I looked at all the new Callaway irons and they were not as forgiving or as far hitting as my Halos. That is why I was thinking of trying the full face version, but need some reviews/comparisons.
[QUOTE=”ULEWZ, post: 12933226, member: 52804″]
Deja vu. I was just thinking this exact thing. FWIW, I currently have the Launcher XL Halo irons and really like them, but am trying real hard to find something better. I looked at all the new Callaway irons and they were not as forgiving or as far hitting as my Halos. That is why I was thinking of trying the full face version, but need some reviews/comparisons.
[/QUOTE]
I’ve considered the Cleveland hybrid irons in the recent past, but didn’t think they hit as far as some of the Callaway offerings out there (Big Bertha, Paradym, ad now Elyte). According to your comment, they are plenty long … did Cleveland strengthen their lofts in the Halos and the Full Face irons? If so, then I’d probably give them another try …
[QUOTE=”MPM1960, post: 12935989, member: 9322″]
I’ve considered the Cleveland hybrid irons in the recent past, but didn’t think they hit as far as some of the Callaway offerings out there (Big Bertha, Paradym, ad now Elyte). According to your comment, they are plenty long … did Cleveland strengthen their lofts in the Halos and the Full Face irons? If so, then I’d probably give them another try …
[/QUOTE]
Cleveland strengthened the lofts a few degrees but nothing compared to other OEM irons.
[QUOTE=”MPM1960, post: 12935989, member: 9322″]
I’ve considered the Cleveland hybrid irons in the recent past, but didn’t think they hit as far as some of the Callaway offerings out there (Big Bertha, Paradym, ad now Elyte). According to your comment, they are plenty long … did Cleveland strengthen their lofts in the Halos and the Full Face irons? If so, then I’d probably give them another try …
[/QUOTE]
I took my Halo 7i to the test, and compared it to 3 different models of the latest Callaway Elyte irons and non hit as far. Close, but not as far. I did kind of like the Max Fast version the best, but no compelling advantage to upgrade other than it is newer. I might change my mind later, but not right now.
[QUOTE=”ULEWZ, post: 12936162, member: 52804″]
I took my Halo 7i to the test, and compared it to 3 different models of the latest Callaway Elyte irons and non hit as far. Close, but not as far. I did kind of like the Max Fast version the best, but no compelling advantage to upgrade other than it is newer. I might change my mind later, but not right now.
[/QUOTE]
I went looking tonight at 7 iron lofts of the clubs I/we mentioned above, and I see that the Cleveland XL Halo 7 iron you play is at 30 degrees loft, and the newer Halo XL Full-Face 7 iron is set at 29 degrees loft. On the Callaway side, the Big Bertha 7 iron is at 27 degrees and the Paradym X 7 iron is at 27.5 degrees. The newer Callaway Elyte 7 iron is set at 29 degrees of loft.
I swung the Halo XL Full Face irons today after taking my wife down to Golf Ranch to try a woman’s Callaway Reva Rise driver. As I suspected, she hit it great and we decided to buy it. Then we remembered a guy at the golf course saying that since my wife is tallish (5’8"), she should try a men’s irons in senior flex as the women’s shafts are too short for her height. So the salesman brought out the Men’s Halo XL Full Face irons in Senior flex, and she hit them well, really well, so add another debit to my charge card. While I was ringing up the clubs and driver, she was in the putting area trying the Scotty putters. She loved mine, and always putted well with it. Well, she found a Scotty she liked, and guess what, another debit to my charge card.
All the while, I am still leaning towards the Halo XL Full Face irons for me, but I am holding off for now as I really like the Ping G440s, but I hit those Halos so well!!
For those that have played, HXL vs HXLFFI’s, are there any comparisons, was it worth the new clubs?
[QUOTE=”Carolina Golfer, post: 13124436, member: 44136″]
For those that have played, HXL vs HXLFFI’s, are there any comparisons, was it worth the new clubs?
[/QUOTE]
I will let you know. 😉 As for my comparison on the launch monitor at Golf Ranch, the FF had a much better sound to my existing Halos, and were about 5 yards longer, but the best part was they went straighter. Playing Tuesday. Clubs show up Monday.
If anyone wanted to know what the counter balance plug they put in the shaft at the grip end, here is what it looks like.
It has a little lip on the top that prevents it from falling completely into the shaft
Anyone gaming these that played previous Cleveland hybrid irons ? Thoughts ?
I had the Halo XLs previously (in the Sim room now) and find the new FF clubs tend to go further and with less mishits. I hit a 5i just over the back of a par 3 hole, and it went straight (should have used the 6i I guess). Maybe it is just new club bias, but so far I think it was worth the upgrade. FFIW, my wife also upgraded to the FF and she shot an 89 last Thursday for the first time. Her upgrade was to a men’s senior flex, so the longer length maybe what helped her with her strikes. I didn’t play last Thursday (got the crud from the grandkids), and next Tuesday is 100% chance of thunder and lightning, so I may have to wait for the next review.
Just a quick story: I was abut 135 yards out, and was a little aprehensive hitting over the water to the green, when my playing partner said, you didn’t come all this way to lay up, so pin hunting I went. Landed 5 feet from the pin and my playing partner said the sound of that hit was fantastic with great results. Yes, the new clubs do sound much better on good strikes.
[QUOTE=”ULEWZ, post: 13140836, member: 52804″]
I had the Halo XLs previously (in the Sim room now) and find the new FF clubs tend to go further and with less mishits. I hit a 5i just over the back of a par 3 hole, and it went straight (should have used the 6i I guess). Maybe it is just new club bias, but so far I think it was worth the upgrade. FFIW, my wife also upgraded to the FF and she shot an 89 last Thursday for the first time. Her upgrade was to a men’s senior flex, so the longer length maybe what helped her with her strikes. I didn’t play last Thursday (got the crud from the grandkids), and next Tuesday is 100% chance of thunder and lightning, so I may have to wait for the next review.
Just a quick story: I was abut 135 yards out, and was a little aprehensive hitting over the water to the green, when my playing partner said, you didn’t come all this way to lay up, so pin hunting I went. Landed 5 feet from the pin and my playing partner said the sound of that hit was fantastic with great results. Yes, the new clubs do sound much better on good strikes.
[/QUOTE]
Good feedback !!
I am having a conundrum right now with my irons. I tried going back to graphite this offseason and it doesn’t seem to be working out well on the course. I feel like I have no idea where the head is during the swing. I pulled out my 85g steel shafted 588 Altitude irons and played 9 last night hitting side by side shots with each iron set and the old trusty Altitude irons won every shot except on one where I thinned my normal 9i and it ended up going to 6′.
So I don’t know if its the shaft or if I am just detined to play hybrid type irons. I also broke out a Cobra T-Rail 6i that I built this winter with a 75g steel Apollo shaft and a Halo XL 6i with XP90 shaft and hit both of those pretty darn well too. Actually hit the Halo XL the best of all the 6i I was trialing yesterday.
[QUOTE=”erock9174, post: 13140850, member: 7797″]
Good feedback !!
I am having a conundrum right now with my irons. I tried going back to graphite this offseason and it doesn’t seem to be working out well on the course. I feel like I have no idea where the head is during the swing. I pulled out my 85g steel shafted 588 Altitude irons and played 9 last night hitting side by side shots with each iron set and the old trusty Altitude irons won every shot except on one where I thinned my normal 9i and it ended up going to 6′.
So I don’t know if its the shaft or if I am just detined to play hybrid type irons. I also broke out a Cobra T-Rail 6i that I built this winter with a 75g steel Apollo shaft and a Halo XL 6i with XP90 shaft and hit both of those pretty darn well too. Actually hit the Halo XL the best of all the 6i I was trialing yesterday.
[/QUOTE]
The Altitudes are just hard to beat. I went from a set of them to the FF HALOS and while they seemed a touch longer, I just didn’t like the bigger looking face. Traded them for my current OL Aerojets that have been in the bag since last September. Myself, I’d take the Altitudes all day over the FF. ??
[QUOTE=”boggyman, post: 13140896, member: 39404″]
The Altitudes are just hard to beat. I went from a set of them to the FF HALOS and while they seemed a touch longer, I just didn’t like the bigger looking face. Traded them for my current OL Aerojets that have been in the bag since last September. Myself, I’d take the Altitudes all day over the FF. ??
[/QUOTE]
Goes to show how great those Altitudes were.
[QUOTE=”russtopher, post: 13140958, member: 14253″]
Goes to show how great those Altitudes were.
[/QUOTE]
The O-G of hybrid irons. Or as I like to call them Ho-G’s lol.
[QUOTE=”MPM1960, post: 12937225, member: 9322″]
I went looking tonight at 7 iron lofts of the clubs I/we mentioned above, and I see that the Cleveland XL Halo 7 iron you play is at 30 degrees loft, and the newer Halo XL Full-Face 7 iron is set at 29 degrees loft. On the Callaway side, the Big Bertha 7 iron is at 27 degrees and the Paradym X 7 iron is at 27.5 degrees. The newer Callaway Elyte 7 iron is set at 29 degrees of loft.
[/QUOTE]
Does anyone know if Cleveland is able to strengthen the lofts of the FF Hybrid Irons a degree or two? I thought they had offered this in recent hybrid iron offerings, but am not sure about the FF hybrid irons … anyone know?
Yes, as they offer lie angle a degree or two either direction as well.
I’d be curious how they bend them. I took my Halo XL 6i to my local shop. Their new loft and lie machine wouldn’t hold that wide of a sole’d club enough to bend it. Then they tried to use their old machine and he said it wouldn’t budge and they were afraid to apply any more pressure to it because of how thin the hollow body construction is (for fear of breaking the head.