- Joined
- Aug 28, 2012
- Messages
- 12,648
- Reaction score
- 1,126
- Location
- planet earth, milky way galaxy
- Handicap
- 15.7
I touched on this in another thread that was about something else and i thought enough of it to bring it up on its own.
I fond that if I have a decent round and/or possibly come close to a personal best then it is vital that I have good results on par3's. To me they are just much too important to have if I am to obtain a good end result with the round's final score. I have my inconsistancies with my "feast or famine" type of play and that includes of course blow-up holes. And I've learned to deal with it here and there fairly OK on the p4's and p5's.
But not on the par3's. I know that the math is what it is and in the end a specific number of strokes is a sum that doesnt know or care what, how, or which way it got there. But when I screw up p3's its just a killer and one part that does get me aggrivated. Just way too important IMO towards a round. The average course has four p3's, some have five and the roll they play towards the round is a huge one IMO.
Thats not to say the other holes are not important. But nothing worse than having my worst plays of the round (or my blow-ups) just so happen to fall upon par 3's. On the other hand nothing better when you par or birdie or at least keep them respectable with combo of pars and bog's.
They just seem to make or break a round IMO more than the rest. Someone many years ago who is pretty darn good at this game pointed this out to me and I believed it then and still do. Said that leaving strokes on par 3's is just somehting you dont and can not get back or make up. At the same time, scoring low on them can make up for alot from elsewhere. In a nut shell, They are vital to a good round of golf no matter what level you play at.
I am curious what everone thinks about this. Do you agree with this? Do you believe the losses or gains from par 3's are more devistating and rewarding towards the round vs other holes? Do you feel they are indeed that vital to a good round? Perhaps you never thought it this way and dont put any thought to it at all. IDK, what would you say.
I fond that if I have a decent round and/or possibly come close to a personal best then it is vital that I have good results on par3's. To me they are just much too important to have if I am to obtain a good end result with the round's final score. I have my inconsistancies with my "feast or famine" type of play and that includes of course blow-up holes. And I've learned to deal with it here and there fairly OK on the p4's and p5's.
But not on the par3's. I know that the math is what it is and in the end a specific number of strokes is a sum that doesnt know or care what, how, or which way it got there. But when I screw up p3's its just a killer and one part that does get me aggrivated. Just way too important IMO towards a round. The average course has four p3's, some have five and the roll they play towards the round is a huge one IMO.
Thats not to say the other holes are not important. But nothing worse than having my worst plays of the round (or my blow-ups) just so happen to fall upon par 3's. On the other hand nothing better when you par or birdie or at least keep them respectable with combo of pars and bog's.
They just seem to make or break a round IMO more than the rest. Someone many years ago who is pretty darn good at this game pointed this out to me and I believed it then and still do. Said that leaving strokes on par 3's is just somehting you dont and can not get back or make up. At the same time, scoring low on them can make up for alot from elsewhere. In a nut shell, They are vital to a good round of golf no matter what level you play at.
I am curious what everone thinks about this. Do you agree with this? Do you believe the losses or gains from par 3's are more devistating and rewarding towards the round vs other holes? Do you feel they are indeed that vital to a good round? Perhaps you never thought it this way and dont put any thought to it at all. IDK, what would you say.