- Admin
- #1,126
He is a terrorists and deserves to be treated as such.
Amen brother. Better be a federal trial, otherwise we get to pay for this scumbag for the rest of his life.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He is a terrorists and deserves to be treated as such.
The flash point of gas is like -45 or something like that can't remember off hand but I'm somewhat close.
He does not deserve to be treated as a criminal! He is a terrorists and deserves to be treated as such.
He does not deserve to be treated as a criminal! He is a terrorists and deserves to be treated as such.
It's not about him, he is screwed, if he was to tell you of a terrorist house full of 100 bombs and 15 terrorist, the whole thing could be thrown out later if a judge decides he was a criminal not an enemy combatant. As much as anybody else I would love to see him treated as a combatant. I just don't see the risk being worth it unless you think another attack is imminent and must be stopped NOW. Obviously I don't know if that is the case.
It's not about him, he is screwed, if he was to tell you of a terrorist house full of 100 bombs and 15 terrorist, the whole thing could be thrown out later if a judge decides he was a criminal not an enemy combatant. As much as anybody else I would love to see him treated as a combatant. I just don't see the risk being worth it unless you think another attack is imminent and must be stopped NOW. Obviously I don't know if that is the case.
Amen brother. Better be a federal trial, otherwise we get to pay for this scumbag for the rest of his life.
Crazy that this guy got out of the perimeter that police had originally set up. Without the person being vigilant at their home, this guy may not have been found for a long time.
Can't they read him his rights at a later time? Or does it have to be immediate?
Generally, Miranda rights accrue when a suspect is subject to custodial interrogation. The public safety exception generally requires a subsequent threat to be present and the suspect to have information that could end / prevent the threat. Case law - which I am not up to speed on - defines all those things...but generally it seems like the PSE wouldn't apply here, as the threat is over (just my two cents)...and since he is in custody and subject to questioning, Miranda rights would be in order...unless he is being treated as an enemy combatant, wherein people have less Constitutional protections/rights.
It seems to me, that if treated as an enemy combatant, that "status" could be revoked at a later time and he coudl be treated as a criminal, and all evidence accrued during the questioning could be out the window Obviously this is far outside of the area that I deal with, so I'm just thinking to myself.
Are they doing a tracheotomy?
Would doubt than an ATF guy would be performing one.
Would doubt than an ATF guy would be performing one.
Are they doing a tracheotomy?
My wife just looked at it and that was her thought before seeing your question. She has done ER nursing so has seen some of that stuff.
It certainly looks like that could be it to me too, but granted I can barely tell the difference between a trach and and vasectomy.
It's a trach, the Swat or ATF carry at least one medic on staff
If you need ever a trach and they take your pants off, start yelling for help. Oh wait, you probably can't if you need a trach. Oh well.