I feel like the PGA Championship sets up courses so that it's just as easy to make birdie as it is to run up a big number. So nah, it's kinda part of the tournament for me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I'm meh on the PGA anyway. Its a step below the other three majors for sure. I know I'm well in the minority but The Players is just as compelling for me personally.
Im with you as well. And I am becoming meh on the British too, just because each year it is more and more apparent that it is a total flip of the coin for weather to decide the winner.
Im with you as well. And I am becoming meh on the British too, just because each year it is more and more apparent that it is a total flip of the coin for weather to decide the winner.
Also on the tangent this thread has taken: weather is part of the game. The impact the weather has on the Open Championship is much more tolerable than the stupid man-made influences the USGA puts in to protect its beloved par at the US Open.
Funny part is that no one complains IMO when the winning score at the Masters is double digits under par like it has been many times since 2000. Spieth set the scoring record there this year and I don't think people were saying it wasn't a good thing.
Also on the tangent this thread has taken: weather is part of the game. The impact the weather has on the Open Championship is much more tolerable than the stupid man-made influences the USGA puts in to protect its beloved par at the US Open.
The PGA Championship doesn't have the pizzazz of the other 3 majors, but in the last 15 years, there have been as least as many suspenseful finishes in the PGA Championship, if not more, than the other majors.
To you. Others dont care for it as much.
What the USGA does impacts the field equally however.
I adore the Open. For me the weather is part of the mystique of the Open Championship, and links golf in general. But to each his own.Im with you as well. And I am becoming meh on the British too, just because each year it is more and more apparent that it is a total flip of the coin for weather to decide the winner.
Same boat, at times it can become a pain like this year, but watching these guys fight the elements on classic courses is wonderful to me. I enjoy it more than fairways cut down to 15 yards wide.I adore the Open. For me the weather is part of the mystique of the Open Championship, and links golf in general. But to each his own.
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Agree 100%. It's just so pure to me. I know it's cliche, but that's the way it feels. Time tested courses that have been around for over 100 years in most cases.Same boat, at times it can become a pain like this year, but watching these guys fight the elements on classic courses is wonderful to me. I enjoy it more than fairways cut down to 15 yards wide.
Funny part is that no one complains IMO when the winning score at the Masters is double digits under par like it has been many times since 2000. Spieth set the scoring record there this year and I don't think people were saying it wasn't a good thing.
Also on the tangent this thread has taken: weather is part of the game. The impact the weather has on the Open Championship is much more tolerable than the stupid man-made influences the USGA puts in to protect its beloved par at the US Open.
The PGA Championship doesn't have the pizzazz of the other 3 majors, but in the last 15 years, there have been as least as many suspenseful finishes in the PGA Championship, if not more, than the other majors.
I adore the Open. For me the weather is part of the mystique of the Open Championship, and links golf in general. But to each his own.
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Nope, if the weather changes for the worse it will become the bogey fest. I just enjoy seeing them play whatever the conditions.
What's goofy, the PGA is an older championship than the Masters.doesn't bother me, but to me there's nothing sets the PGA championship apart from several other events. I think it's a bit of a throwaway major that is trying to gain a foothold. the masters has the tradition and allure of Augusta National; the U.S. Open has its crazy measures to protect par; the Open Championship has the different setting (to us as Americans) and crazy weather and very different playing style; and the PGA has what? I often the Players and the Memorial to be more compelling than the PGA.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What's goofy, the PGA is an older championship than the Masters.