Erky
New member
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
- Messages
- 6,143
- Reaction score
- 5
Has the US Open become too much about Mike Davis? I can't think of another tournament where I know the name of the guy in charge of the setup and layout of the course, but there he is year after year, drying out and tricking out courses. From the outside, it seems like he's a control freak who loves attention he receives from controversial setups and insists on micro-managing the USGA. There is currently a broken handicap system, and golf is on the decline. The courses in the last several US Opens have seemed more like personal laboratories of Mike Davis than anything else.
What can the USGA do more of? What can they do better? Is Mike Davis the best person for the job? Is the Executive Director's time best served micro managing course conditions? Does the USGA seem stuffy and arrogant, even compared to the Masters now?
What can the USGA do more of? What can they do better? Is Mike Davis the best person for the job? Is the Executive Director's time best served micro managing course conditions? Does the USGA seem stuffy and arrogant, even compared to the Masters now?