Last year Callaway launched the latest iteration of the Chrome Soft and Chrome Soft X golf balls. Immediate feedback from golfers on the THP Forum suggested that both balls were high in performance to go along with the tech story. Today a third member of the family is here called the Chrome Soft X LS (CSX LS).
Despite what is mentioned around the internet, distance is not just pure speed. That is one component of what you are looking for in a golf ball to create maximum length and consistency. Spin, launch angle and a number of other factors are included in this equation as well. For many golfers, choosing a ball starts at the green and works backwards, and while that equation works just fine, the difference between golf balls with full swings differ quite a bit (we saw 10 yards with an 8 iron). We tested this out in a recent video you can find here.
The Callaway golf ball line was already fairly robust, and at the top of that lineup was the Chrome Soft and Chrome Soft X. On one end of this two ball spectrum you have low spin off the tee and solid speed and spin around the green, while on the other end of the spectrum you have one of the fastest golf balls on the market that is also higher in spin. Enter Chrome Soft X LS.
The Chrome Soft X LS is a 4-piece single core construction that is in some ways a compromise between the two. Although compromise is probably not the right word since there were no compromises used to create the CSX LS. What this offers is speed. Very fast speed while also maintaining low spin.
Large SoftFast core was designed to deliver high speeds, but not just with the driver, throughout the bag. The mantle layers are fairly unique in that the inner mantle is quite soft, while the outer mantle is more firm and together they create…you guessed it, SPEED! The CSX LS is then wrapped in a very thin urethane cover that in our testing is pretty darn durable.
As faster swinging golfers search for distance without the increase in spin, the CSX LS delivers that, yet makes no compromises around the green. Is low spin and distance throughout the bag necessary for everybody? No. In fact, many golfers will fit squarely into Chrome Soft or Chrome Soft X in the Callaway lineup. This third option is best suited for better players that are looking for spin reduction on full swings, especially with longer clubs such as off the tee, without losing control green side.
For those that wonder about the usage breakdown, it goes something like this. Chrome Soft is the number one selling tour ball from Callaway. Chrome Soft X is their most used ball on tour. While Callaway expects most tour pros to stay with Chrome Soft X, the initial conversion to CSX LS by a few has already taken place. Marc Leishman, Akshay Bhatia and Wesley Bryan all have made the switch to the lower spinning option.
Which one of the three options is best suited for you? Give us your thoughts below.
The Details
In Stores: March 18th, 2021
Cost: $47.99
Options: White, Triple Track and Yellow with Triple Track
[QUOTE=”oumagic, post: 10179817, member: 52535″]
We have a new shop that is offering a $40 ball fitting and they waive the fee if you by a dozen balls they fit you into. I am going to take my current ball (e12 contact/BRX) and compare to Prov1 that I fitted in at a titleist demo and the CSXLS. I need to know if it was my imagination that the CSXLS was long for me off the tee but a little wayward off irons. I hope it was just some off days with the irons because I remember these fondly and am almost through enough balls to buy some more.
golf balls are hard for me to know if what I am feeling is real or just that day, but I remember absolutely loving this ball off the tee.
this shop mostly apecializes in apparel and custom carts; the only balls I saw available were titleist and Callaway, so worst case I pay the $40 for some sim time and stick with my current balls. I will also take some others I have in the garage: snell mtbx black, prior gen srixon xv, vice pro. They had every chrome soft there and all titleist if I want to look at ERC/AVX.
[/QUOTE]
That’s awesome of the pro-shop. I wish some of ours would do that.
Paging [USER=2320]@Canadan[/USER]
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 10186125, member: 3″]
Paging [USER=2320]@Canadan[/USER]
[/QUOTE]
Oh we’re still on this hahahaha
LS over regular Chrome Soft though? Interesting banter awaits us.
[QUOTE=”Canadan, post: 10186131, member: 2320″]
Oh we’re still on this hahahaha
LS over regular Chrome Soft though? Interesting banter awaits us.
[/QUOTE]
I will be curious about this test, because lower spin off the tee will be similar, but in hte irons, it might rise a bit for the LS.
It will be fun to follow though.
[QUOTE=”Canadan, post: 10186131, member: 2320″]
Oh we’re still on this hahahaha
LS over regular Chrome Soft though? Interesting banter awaits us.
[/QUOTE]
Speaking from my fitting using launch monitor data and comparing the 3 CS golf balls. I will not speak to how it compared to others. These are just my results. Forgive my lengthy post.
My SS is between 110 and 115.
Driver
1. There was a 5 yard difference between each ball CS add 5 yds CS X LS add 5 yds CS X
2. Apex height went from CS highest, CS X LS lower and CS X lowest
3. Spin CS X highest CS X LS about 200 lower (avg) CS about 150 lower than CS X LS
4. Dispersion CS and CS X LS very similar CS X wider (left to right)
5. softness CS softest then CS X, then X LS
Irons
1. Same as above but the spin number reduction changed about another 100RPM
2. CS Checked and rolled with 7 iron, CS X checked and rolled backwards past pitch, CS X LS Checked and stopped or rolled back a little.
Wedges
Same as irons.
1. The CS X LS definitely felt VERY firm with wedges
2. More of a click with CS X and CS X LS off wedge
Putter
1. CS duller thud, CS X and CS X LS more of a click off face
2. Could be just a feel, but I felt like the CS X and CS X LS traveled a little longer for the “same stroke”.
In all instances I am not a professional, nor a scratch golfer. These were relative trends from testing.
When I went to the practice facility and used all the balls to see how they interacted with 50yd wedge play that’s where it was most appreciable in a difference.
A great ball fitting must be done side by side and comparing the results of 1 ball to another from shot to shot. I was amazed at the difference to be honest.
[QUOTE=”hadi05, post: 10186207, member: 50784″]
Speaking from my fitting using launch monitor data and comparing the 3 CS golf balls. I will not speak to how it compared to others. These are just my results. Forgive my lengthy post.
My SS is between 110 and 115.
Driver
1. There was a 5 yard difference between each ball CS add 5 yds CS X LS add 5 yds CS X
2. Apex height went from CS highest, CS X LS lower and CS X lowest
3. Spin CS X highest CS X LS about 200 lower (avg) CS about 150 lower than CS X LS
4. Dispersion CS and CS X LS very similar CS X wider (left to right)
5. softness CS softest then CS X, then X LS
Irons
1. Same as above but the spin number reduction changed about another 100RPM
2. CS Checked and rolled with 7 iron, CS X checked and rolled backwards past pitch, CS X LS Checked and stopped or rolled back a little.
Wedges
Same as irons.
1. The CS X LS definitely felt VERY firm with wedges
2. More of a click with CS X and CS X LS off wedge
Putter
1. CS duller thud, CS X and CS X LS more of a click off face
2. Could be just a feel, but I felt like the CS X and CS X LS traveled a little longer for the “same stroke”.
In all instances I am not a professional, nor a scratch golfer. These were relative trends from testing.
When I went to the practice facility and used all the balls to see how they interacted with 50yd wedge play that’s where it was most appreciable in a difference.
A great ball fitting must be done side by side and comparing the results of 1 ball to another from shot to shot. I was amazed at the difference to be honest.
[/QUOTE]
I am a huge fan of the CSX. When I first tried the CSX LS I thought it felt too hard. My game was a mess at that point and I went back to what I knew I liked. Locally, Callaway balls are extremely difficult to find. So, when I went into the shop for some more CSX, all I could get was the LS. So, I decided to give them another try. Still found them to be firmer than the CSX but my results were pretty damn good. I agree with what you were seeing especially in irons. I am a low spin iron guy so the CS just wasn’t consistent enough in carry distance as I can struggle to generate enough spin out of the cabbage. The LS seems to be a happy medium for me. If someone put a gun to my head and made me choose, it would still be CSX. But the LS is no slouch. A little longer off the tee which I don’t mind at all haha.
[QUOTE=”radiman, post: 10186235, member: 15228″]
I am a huge fan of the CSX. When I first tried the CSX LS I thought it felt too hard. My game was a mess at that point and I went back to what I knew I liked. Locally, Callaway balls are extremely difficult to find. So, when I went into the shop for some more CSX, all I could get was the LS. So, I decided to give them another try. Still found them to be firmer than the CSX but my results were pretty damn good. I agree with what you were seeing especially in irons. I am a low spin iron guy so the CS just wasn’t consistent enough in carry distance as I can struggle to generate enough spin out of the cabbage. The LS seems to be a happy medium for me. If someone put a gun to my head and made me choose, it would still be CSX. But the LS is no slouch. A little longer off the tee which I don’t mind at all haha.
[/QUOTE]
Great feedback! It is definitely more firm and spins more than the CS. We will see how it does this winter when I get to play. Will it be the same feel as it is now, or will it feel like I am hitting a piece of river gravel…. I plan to keep a few in my pocket when I play to keep them warm :);););)
I have never had a ball fitting but am scheduled for one today. Looking forward to trying all of the CS balls and Titleist to see what fits me best. My only feedback on golf balls are just what I think I see on the course.
I have thoughts on the Callaway line going into the fitting from what I see on the course and wonder if I am correct.
[QUOTE=”hadi05, post: 10186258, member: 50784″]
Great feedback! It is definitely more firm and spins more than the CS. We will see how it does this winter when I get to play. Will it be the same feel as it is now, or will it feel like I am hitting a piece of river gravel…. I plan to keep a few in my pocket when I play to keep them warm :);););)
[/QUOTE]
Haha, I meant firm relative to the others. Shouldn’t quite Feel like River rock haha.
[QUOTE=”radiman, post: 10186281, member: 15228″]
Haha, I meant firm relative to the others. Shouldn’t quite Feel like River rock haha.
[/QUOTE]
you never know 😉
[QUOTE=”oumagic, post: 10186272, member: 52535″]
I have never had a ball fitting but am scheduled for one today. Looking forward to trying all of the CS balls and Titleist to see what fits me best. My only feedback on golf balls are just what I think I see on the course.
I have thoughts on the Callaway line going into the fitting from what I see on the course and wonder if I am correct.
[/QUOTE]
Enjoy the fitting! Seeing the side by side was very eye opening for me. I tried 6 different golf balls + the CS family. Normally wouldn’t have been 9 total, but I gave the fitter a little extra for more time with them so I could gain a better understanding of the ball fitting process and how other balls stacked up vs my perceptions.
[QUOTE=”hadi05, post: 10186391, member: 50784″]
Enjoy the fitting! Seeing the side by side was very eye opening for me. I tried 6 different golf balls + the CS family. Normally wouldn’t have been 9 total, but I gave the fitter a little extra for more time with them so I could gain a better understanding of the ball fitting process and how other balls stacked up vs my perceptions.
[/QUOTE]
So the real q is, what will you be playing this season? 😀
[QUOTE=”10islaw, post: 10187111, member: 20379″]
So the real q is, what will you be playing this season? 😀
[/QUOTE]
I’m playing the Callaway CS X LS! 100% love the ball and the fitter agreed it was best for my atrocious golf game. ???
A friend and I went through the process together. Neither of us are great at golf.
What we learned was this, even amateurs should be fit for a golf ball because there is a VERY high probability it’s not the ball that’s best for your game your scores and wallet will reflect it.
Don’t box yourself in to what marketers tell you, you might be surprised what ball actually works for you.
Had the CSX-LS in play on Saturday in cold, wet conditions and it held up well. I need that extra bit off the tee on days when drives are plugging in the fairway with no roll out
[QUOTE=”oumagic, post: 10186272, member: 52535″]
I have never had a ball fitting but am scheduled for one today. Looking forward to trying all of the CS balls and Titleist to see what fits me best. My only feedback on golf balls are just what I think I see on the course.
I have thoughts on the Callaway line going into the fitting from what I see on the course and wonder if I am correct.
[/QUOTE]
[USER=52535]@oumagic[/USER] how’d the fitting go?
I have a brand spanking new dozen ChromeSoft X LS Triple Track courtesy of the crew from The Dream Foursomes Experience. I’ve played CS and CSX but the LS will be a new adventure for me. I’m pretty stoked to get them out on course.
Thanks!! [USER=53564]@V14_Heels[/USER] [USER=51300]@Carolina Dundee[/USER] [USER=60107]@jfox789[/USER] [USER=42964]@Tenputt[/USER] [USER=42734]@Bernoulli[/USER] [USER=48932]@BigDill[/USER]
[QUOTE=”GraniteRoost, post: 10243926, member: 40185″]
I have a brand spanking new dozen ChromeSoft X LS Triple Track courtesy of the crew from The Dream Foursomes Experience. I’ve played CS and CSX but the LS will be a new adventure for me. I’m pretty stoked to get them out on course.
Thanks!! [USER=53564]@V14_Heels[/USER] [USER=51300]@Carolina Dundee[/USER] [USER=60107]@jfox789[/USER] [USER=42964]@Tenputt[/USER] [USER=42734]@Bernoulli[/USER] [USER=48932]@BigDill[/USER]
[/QUOTE]
Let us know how you like the LS.
[QUOTE=”GraniteRoost, post: 10243926, member: 40185″]
I have a brand spanking new dozen ChromeSoft X LS Triple Track courtesy of the crew from The Dream Foursomes Experience. I’ve played CS and CSX but the LS will be a new adventure for me. I’m pretty stoked to get them out on course.
Thanks!! [USER=53564]@V14_Heels[/USER] [USER=51300]@Carolina Dundee[/USER] [USER=60107]@jfox789[/USER] [USER=42964]@Tenputt[/USER] [USER=42734]@Bernoulli[/USER] [USER=48932]@BigDill[/USER]
[/QUOTE]
Excited to hear what you think. I played a dozen of the LS this year but went back the CSX.
This ball is really growing on me. Can’t wait to hear what how they’re planning to improve the durability of the cover! Only downside I’ve really found
I’ve had really good success with the standard chromesoft and the x-ls. I can’t wait to try the next lineup!!
I did a little unscientific test today between the Chrome Soft X and the XLS. I played my first 4 holes with the CSX and the next 12 or so holes (donated to the golf gods via a water hazard) with the XLS.
– both fee pretty similar off the tee but the CSX felt les firm to me
– distance off the tee appeared to be the same and I noticed I was getting more rollout with the CSX LS
– off the irons similar to the tee in terms of feel. Didn’t notice any big jumps in distance gains and the main standout was the XLS didn’t have the spin I was used to seeing from the CSX.
– for some reason I felt the XLS was a lot more firmer off the wedges and putter. Again purely subjective, but based on my last year or so with the CSX,I noticed the difference.
I think overall if I had no choice I would put the XLS in play and be ok, but for me the CSX just checks all the boxes and the spin into and around the greens is what separates these two. If there is a golfer that doesn’t need the spin help like I do, then the CSX LS is probably a better fit.
[USER=15992]@mikeg_74[/USER] this is very similar to how I felt with the X vs the X LS. I don’t need the spin, so the X was too much for me. The X LS is a higher compression ball compared to the X so it feels more firm on the wedge and clicky and firm on the putter and it definitely rolls longer for the same stroke which helped me too.
I really enjoyed your review! Sounds like you had a lot of fun!
[USER=15992]@mikeg_74[/USER] did you notice a higher ball flight with the X LS vs the X? It seemed to me that the X had a more piercing trajectory than the X LS.
[QUOTE=”mikeg_74, post: 10319620, member: 15992″]
I did a little unscientific test today between the Chrome Soft X and the XLS. I played my first 4 holes with the CSX and the next 12 or so holes (donated to the golf gods via a water hazard) with the XLS.
– both fee pretty similar off the tee but the CSX felt les firm to me
– distance off the tee appeared to be the same and I noticed I was getting more rollout with the CSX LS
– off the irons similar to the tee in terms of feel. Didn’t notice any big jumps in distance gains and the main standout was the XLS didn’t have the spin I was used to seeing from the CSX.
– for some reason I felt the XLS was a lot more firmer off the wedges and putter. Again purely subjective, but based on my last year or so with the CSX,I noticed the difference.
I think overall if I had no choice I would put the XLS in play and be ok, but for me the CSX just checks all the boxes and the spin into and around the greens is what separates these two. If there is a golfer that doesn’t need the spin help like I do, then the CSX LS is probably a better fit.
[/QUOTE]
All your points are spot on! Your feeling on points 1 and 4 mayyyyy change for 22 though:unsure:
point 3 may or may not be closer together as well
[QUOTE=”Muchmore18, post: 10319689, member: 56094″]
All your points are spot on! Your feeling on points 1 and 4 mayyyyy change for 22 though:unsure:
point 3 may or may not be closer together as well
[/QUOTE]
Can’t wait for the ’22 Chrome Soft family!
[QUOTE=”hadi05, post: 10319695, member: 50784″]
Can’t wait for the ’22 Chrome Soft family!
[/QUOTE]
You can say that again ?
[QUOTE=”Muchmore18, post: 10319697, member: 56094″]
You can say that again ?
[/QUOTE]
Can’t wait for the ’22 Chrome Soft family! :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
Definitely going to give these balls a shot this year.
[QUOTE=”LSMO, post: 10319707, member: 33657″]
Definitely going to give these balls a shot this year.
[/QUOTE]
Can’t speak for the ’22, but the ’21 family was definitely really good!
[QUOTE=”Muchmore18, post: 10319689, member: 56094″]
All your points are spot on! Your feeling on points 1 and 4 mayyyyy change for 22 though:unsure:
point 3 may or may not be closer together as well
[/QUOTE]
[media=giphy]I5xVnGJRHZZf2[/media]
[QUOTE=”mikeg_74, post: 10319733, member: 15992″]
[media=giphy]I5xVnGJRHZZf2[/media]
[/QUOTE]
?
[media=giphy]3jiLGzCgPuWHiipsVN[/media]
I’m with [USER=56094]@Muchmore18[/USER]
firm believer in the 22 LS
[QUOTE=”xThor, post: 10319751, member: 19092″]
I’m with [USER=56094]@Muchmore18[/USER]
firm believer in the 22 LS
[/QUOTE]
[media=giphy]oF5oUYTOhvFnO[/media]
[QUOTE=”xThor, post: 10319751, member: 19092″]
I’m with [USER=56094]@Muchmore18[/USER]
firm believer in the 22 LS
[/QUOTE]
[media=giphy]jErnybNlfE1lm[/media]
[QUOTE=”Muchmore18, post: 10319689, member: 56094″]
All your points are spot on! Your feeling on points 1 and 4 mayyyyy change for 22 though:unsure:
point 3 may or may not be closer together as well
[/QUOTE]
Interesting. I can’t wait to hear more. CSX is my ball because our greens our very unreceptive. I get a lot of spin from it. I could get a little more distance off the tee and with the irons with the LS but don’t want to give up stopping power.
[QUOTE=”GolfFest, post: 10319767, member: 20124″]
Interesting. I can’t wait to hear more. CSX is my ball because our greens our very unreceptive. I get a lot of spin from it. I could get a little more distance off the tee and with the irons with the LS but don’t want to give up stopping power.
[/QUOTE]
I’m not saying the LS and the X are going to be identical. There’s a reason Rahm still plays the X. But it’s going to be a harder choice than it was in 21
[QUOTE=”Muchmore18, post: 10319773, member: 56094″]
I’m not saying the LS and the X are going to be identical. There’s a reason Rahm still plays the X. But it’s going to be a harder choice than it was in 21
[/QUOTE]
I have no doubt I’m going to be trying both next year. Most likely alternate based on course conditions.
All this testing may be obsolete very shortly. ??
[QUOTE=”Muchmore18, post: 10319773, member: 56094″]
I’m not saying the LS and the X are going to be identical. There’s a reason Rahm still plays the X. But it’s going to be a harder choice than it was in 21
[/QUOTE]
I’m hoping all these maybes make it an easier choice in 22. I like all 3 for different reasons. This year was a tough call.
[QUOTE=”dacatalyst41, post: 10320139, member: 40754″]
All this testing may be obsolete very shortly. ??
[/QUOTE]
This comment reeks of ball fitting innovation ????
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”1640314898984.png”]9054922[/ATTACH]
Can’t wait for knowledge bomb drops for this line next month!
This was a fun one today with the OG ’21 CSX LS. Pin high left. I had some great results off Driver today with this ball.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9058398[/ATTACH]