By now, it feels like everyone knows “The Wedge Guy” Terry Koehler, and if you have followed THP for any period of time then you know even more about the journey and passion he has for the short game. The Edison brand is his latest brainchild and while their first wedge met much positive feedback, there was still work to be done, so the Edison 2.0 wedges were created. THP was able to get a full set of the 2.0’s in hand to give a thorough tech and performance rundown.
Edison 2.0 Wedges Review – Quick Take
A wedge specifically designed for amateur golfers and their needs, but in a very player-like visual package. The Koehler Sole remains the most effective V-Sole on the market and increased weight shift with the secondary “cavity” has brought an even more controlled trajectory for golfers of all skill levels while adding a little more playability too. Not the most “traditional” look, but the performance should overcome that for most.
Edison 2.0 Wedges Review – Design Rundown
Given the use of 2.0 in the name, you already know this is an evolution on the original Edison wedges. There are some subtle changes like moving to a new finish which uses a bead blasted chrome they refer to as “Pearl Chrome” that definitely increase the eye appeal on the wedges and now they carry a “5X Forged” stamping on each head, although that process is the same from the 1.0’s. Honestly, that is a pretty simple yet smart inclusion as the whole purpose is to denote that these are forged in a world of cast wedges and Koehler and company want that to stand out.
The “Koehler Sole” is front and center, though to me it will always be referred to as the V-Sole from back in the Eidolon days with Terry. The fact that it has carried on and evolved shows how well it performs, which has been well documented over the years by the THP Community in its many iterations. The big change, however, is in the shaping and weight placement, all done with the intention of creating a wedge that offers forgiveness without sacrificing shot making.
These are very much amateur driven wedges, not Tour driven, and no matter your thoughts on the looks or any other aspect, you have to give Edison a tip of the cap for that. In the first version, there was a shallow “cavity” scoop out on the rear flange to move mass, now with the 2.0 there is a second cavity which brings the weight movement to 14 to 17 grams depending on the loft in hand. This movement is higher in the clubheads to move the CG up for a flatter flight and more control while also increasing the overall forgiveness possible in a compact wedge.
Edison 2.0 Wedges Review – In-Play Performance
I’ve been able to have the Edison 2.0’s in hand for an extended amount of time now through testing as well as general play, and one of the most complimentary things I can say about them is they are definitely a TK wedge design. What I mean by that is there is an attention to all the details in each and every one of the lofts available (45-59 in odd numbered lofts which can be bent either way). For this review I worked with the 45, 49, 53, and 57 degree Edison 2.0’s paired with the KBS Tour 120S.
Visually, if you have sat the first versions down at address before, then you know what you are getting here as they are practically identical at setup. Using calipers, I did denote that the topline is ever so slightly smaller in the 2.0’s than my 1.0’s, but we are talking miniscule. The move to the blasted “Pearl” finish helps make the hosel transition to the topline look much cleaner to my eye and the leading edge remains subtly curved.
I do have to say, the new dual-cavity look is not the cleanest, even as simply and cleanly forged as the head itself actually is. I know that seems contradictory, but what I mean is there are no badges or secondary materials, simply the 5X Forged 1025 Carbon Steel, and yet with the secondary scallop in the back, it still feels a bit busy. That is absolutely a personal take, but it is something that will come up in conversation with these wedges whether you love the look, or not, because those cutouts are what stands out most.
Speaking of the 5X Forged subject, Terry Koehler has long been an advocate for the benefits of forged wedges versus cast. Now, this is not the place to get into that as a general discussion with so many of the highest selling wedges out there being cast, but rather how it impacts the performance of the Edison 2.0’s. For me, I love a forged wedge, but in a traditionally bladed model I would argue that 95% of golfers cannot discern the difference versus cast. Here, for me, with the dual cavity design there was a more crisp but dense feedback at impact which I very much associate with better golfers in terms of sound.
CLUB | TARGET | BALL SPEED | LAUNCH | SPIN | CARRY | TOTAL | HEIGHT |
Edison 2.0 45 | 50Y | 56 | 24 | 4539 | 51 | 54 | 6Y |
Edison 2.0 49 | 50Y | 54 | 25 | 5381 | 51 | 53 | 7Y |
Edison 2.0 53 | 50Y | 54 | 26 | 6501 | 49 | 50 | 7Y |
Edison 2.0 57 | 50Y | 51 | 28 | 6814 | 47 | 47 | 8Y |
Honestly, on the course as well as the launch monitor, the Edison 2.0’s were exactly what I would expect from a TK design as someone who has played his Eidolon, SCOR, Hogan, and now Edison creations. Outdoors the Koehler V-Sole was the biggest standout, having played them in all the conditions possible and from PW to LW lofts, the confidence it gives to go down and get a golf ball never ceases to amaze me.
CLUB | TARGET | BALL SPEED | LAUNCH | SPIN | CARRY | TOTAL | HEIGHT |
Edison 2.0 45 | 80Y | 72 | 21 | 5947 | 83 | 86 | 11Y |
Edison 2.0 49 | 80Y | 72 | 24 | 6539 | 82 | 83 | 13Y |
Edison 2.0 53 | 80Y | 72 | 26 | 8776 | 83 | 82 | 16Y |
Edison 2.0 57 | 80Y | 71 | 30 | 9170 | 81 | 80 | 18Y |
From tight lies, to mud, to bunkers, the sole proved a workhorse with the only digging coming because I blacked out and forgot how to swing a club every now and then. The more interesting story for me was that I felt like I was able to really hit different windows with these depending on the shot I needed, and they were all flatter and tighter than with the 1.0. Even in the full swing data you will see the way the ball worked to the apex was flatter and that transferred to the course nicely with the wind I play in.
CLUB | TARGET | BALL SPEED | LAUNCH | SPIN | CARRY | TOTAL | HEIGHT |
Edison 2.0 45 | Full | 109 | 22 | 8724 | 143 | 144 | 32Y |
Edison 2.0 49 | Full | 102 | 23 | 9500 | 131 | 132 | 30Y |
Edison 2.0 53 | Full | 95 | 27 | 10372 | 116 | 115 | 29Y |
Edison 2.0 57 | Full | 87 | 28 | 10489 | 104 | 103 | 26Y |
I will say that while forgiveness is a major talking point for Edison with the 2.0’s, and they are more forgiving compared to a traditionally bladed wedge, they are still a compact design. What I mean there is you can get away with more than you expect given the weighting and sole design, but they aren’t a magic bullet that will erase all misses. All in all, they are a well done package performance wise that can do all the things pretty well, and for the amateur golfer these are designed for, that is a very positive prospect.
Edison 2.0 Wedges Review – The Details
The Edison Golf 2.0 wedges are available in odd numbered lofts from 45 to 59 degrees. The offering of only odd numbered lofts further differentiates Edison, but it also helps control inventory as you can request even numbered lofts which will be met by adjusting odd numbered heads. The Edison 2.0 wedges are available now from www.edisonwedges.com and are priced at $199.95 (steel) and $214.95 (graphite) with various shaft options available.
Good stuff here [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]! Edison wedges always perform it looks like.
Really good data here and glad you commented on seeing the same on course as you are in the testing.
This is a wedge series that could help a lot of golfers I believe.
[QUOTE=”Thrillbilly Jim, post: 12266047, member: 50607″]
Good stuff here [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]! Edison wedges always perform it looks like.
[/QUOTE]
Thank you!
It’s one thing about TK wedges, they’re always quite good, and his version of the V-Sole remains the best I’ve ever tried, if I could have it on every wedge I ever made played, I would.
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 12266052, member: 3″]
Really good data here and glad you commented on seeing the same on course as you are in the testing.
This is a wedge series that could help a lot of golfers I believe.
[/QUOTE]
I agree.
I know the looks will draw strong reactions from people both ways, but the premise itself as well as the execution is there. Lots of people are moving mass, no one is doing it like this and keeping the profile as small as they are.
They’re honestly really fun wedges.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12266080, member: 1579″]
I agree.
I know the looks will draw strong reactions from people both ways, but the premise itself as well as the execution is there. Lots of people are moving mass, no one is doing it like this and keeping the profile as small as they are.
They’re honestly really fun wedges.
[/QUOTE]
The looks are much better in hand, then from pictures, in my experience. Looks are different, but at address is it in line with my Zipcore wedge. The finish has held up really well, and I think that was a great change for Edison in the 2.0, moving to the Pearl finish.
[QUOTE=”gkeller813, post: 12266120, member: 51675″]
The looks are much better in hand, then from pictures, in my experience. Looks are different, but at address is it in line with my Zipcore wedge. The finish has held up really well, and I think that was a great change for Edison in the 2.0, moving to the Pearl finish.
[/QUOTE]
Eh, imo, they’re not great looking with the double scallop, it’s just an awkward look. Obviously it’s a design element to move more mass as I stated in the review, but it’s not exactly a pretty look.
The decision to bead blast them this time around was a wise one indeed, they definitely do hide wear better than my 1.0’s.
I’m a big fan of what Edison is doing and wouldn’t hesitate to toss mine in the bag at any time. It’s a shame they don’t photograph very well, because I think they look pretty nice in person.
Really enjoyed the write up [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] , and glad these will be getting some more eyes on them.
Wanted to add some data to the conversation. I played the 2.0’s in the 49* and 53* for most of 2023. I did try one in the 58*, but I didn’t have as much luck there. Just had a good comfort level with my old 58* that I couldn’t get with the Edison.
But in the 49* and 53* I have absolutely loved what I have experienced on course. Like was mentioned above, the peak height on shots, especially with the 49* is visually lower, but with spin you will have no issues keeping the ball where you want it. On windy days, this comes in real handy. The flight of the 53* is also lower, but is less noticeable the shorter my shots get. I have seen my GIR stay about the same from 100 yards and in, but have really improved my proximity. Below, looking at the shots from 25-50 yards, where I use my 54*, from 2022 to 2023 I have improved by 6 feet overall, but the biggest improvement has been from the fairway. I went from 29 feet, down to 10. I’ve always struggled with consistency off fairway lies with a wedge in hand, but the Edison has really helped me here. The weighting, and where I usually hit it, higher on the face, gives me the help I need, and much more consistent results.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9255944[/ATTACH]
Great Write up [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] – My only experience with TK was back in the day with the SCOR wedges, but I loved those things.
Sadly doesn’t look like they offer LH wedges at this point
[QUOTE=”TRyan, post: 12266161, member: 5933″]
Great Write up [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] – My only experience with TK was back in the day with the SCOR wedges, but I loved those things.
Sadly doesn’t look like they offer LH wedges at this point
[/QUOTE]
I thiiiiiiiiiiink it’s part of the plan?
Just as I know they’re working on adding lofts down to 41 or 43
[QUOTE=”TRyan, post: 12266161, member: 5933″]
Great Write up [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] – My only experience with TK was back in the day with the SCOR wedges, but I loved those things.
Sadly doesn’t look like they offer LH wedges at this point
[/QUOTE]
And man, I loved SCOR, if they’d have had this blasted finish…..whew.
[QUOTE=”Jman, post: 12266168, member: 1579″]
And man, I loved SCOR, if they’d have had this blasted finish…..whew.
[/QUOTE]
SCOR was so much fun. I vividly remember enjoying the heck outta those things
Great write up on these [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]. I agree with so much of what you wrote, especially the forgiving part. These are a wedge that will absolutely help golfers who struggle with consistent contact in all situations. I was lucky enough to get one for the pw challenge. It’s my 135 club and it blew me away how easy it is to hit it that distance every time!
I think I am going to drop a lower lofted one in my bag for a trial run
[QUOTE=”JB, post: 12266444, member: 3″]
I think I am going to drop a lower lofted one in my bag for a trial run
[/QUOTE]
PW replacement?
It’s funny, every time I go back and hit them, I remember why I enjoy them.
Thank you for the review. Great writeup.
Have always liked his wedges, started with the Eidolons, which could spin like no other wedge I’ve owned. That was two decades ago. Just wish I knew back then what I know now about using the sole.
If anyone has any doubts, let them melt away. Try them.
As their target market, an amateur golfer who doesn’t always hit the bottom 3 grooves on my wedge, the 2.0’s have helped me become more consistent from 110 yards and in. I have less distance loss on less than ideal strikes, but I still have the ability to work the ball up and down, and attack pins if I want. I great overall package that can benefit a lot of golfers.
I may give one or two a try next time I replace wedges. I like the concept. I would prefer them in black, though. Wedges always look best in black to me.
Just to add a bit more here from my time with the Edison. I mentioned data points for shots from 25-50 yards, but I also wanted to look at the data on shots from 50-100 yards, where I used a combination of my 49* and 53*. As you can see overall I’ve been about 6 feet closer, with my overall proximity falling to 34 feet. I didn’t have any bunker shots from this range with the Edison’s. The Fairway continues to be a place where the Edison shines. I improved by 13 feet, from 40 to 27 feet from the pin. The proximity on shots from the rough did increase a bit though, from 38 feet, to 41 feet.
On the left is 2022. On the right is 2023 with the Edison 2.0’s.[B] [/B]
[ATTACH type=”full” width=”410px” alt=”1000000384.jpg”]9256516[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full” width=”413px” alt=”1000000383.jpg”]9256517[/ATTACH]
Even as…unique…looking as these are, I’m constantly contemplating putting them in the bag for a decent stretch just based on how good they are in there full and 3/4 swings for me.
I love my 2.0s. I’ve had them for about 9 months in 47, 51, and 55. They are a pleasure to play with. Definitely helped my short game
Had these on the course today, and they performed well again. The 53* from greenside is a work in progress due to the new season, but I had some really good touch shots that got me close and in good spots to get up and down. Didn’t execute with the putter, but still feel good about my short game.
Had 1 shot in on the last hole. A bit of a wet lie from the fairway, and flew the pin. Still a great strike, got through the wet turf, and was right one line. Just need to work on my distance control on these in between shots. Still love what I get out of the Edison 2.0’s from a variety of lies/conditions.
I’m intrigued by Edison and hope to give them a try one of these days
[QUOTE=”shanewu, post: 12285263, member: 38120″]
I’m intrigued by Edison and hope to give them a try one of these days
[/QUOTE]
I’ve always been a Cleveland wedge player, but have really enjoyed the Edisons. In the longer wedge shots they really shine. The consistency has also been really good for me.
My Edison 2.0 wedges (48*, 54* and 58*) have saved my butt — and my score — many times in my dozen or so competitive rounds in 2024! I love the 48* from distances ranging from 80 to 105 yards. The 54* Edison 2.0 is fantastic from inside 75 yards and for longer bunker shots around the greens, and the 58* is the best of the bunch, helping me to produce near-miraculous shots from deep bunkers, over bunkers to tight pin positions and whenever I find myself shortsided.
Because my 2.0 wedges are on their way to Scotland (first and second stops at St Andrews next week, followed by Carnoustie, Kingsbarns, North Berwick, and Gullane), I have put my first generation Edison’s (49*, 54* and 59*) back in my bag for the rounds that I will be playing stateside over the next 3 days. They performed well for me before I purchased the 2.0s last year, so let’s hope that some of that magic remains.
These continue to be solid wedges. Had a few shots from the thick rough, and the 49* got me up and out both times. One I hit a bit long, still on the green, but the other set up a birdie attempt. They were between 75 and 90 yards out. A lot of confidence in the 49* from this distance, from a variety of lies.
The 53* on bump and runs was even better. Had 3 of these shots today from 20 yards and in, and got up and down on all of them. 2 for par, and 1 birdie.
Been living a bit too far out on the toe recently, so spent some time with the 53* tonight. When I can find the middle of the face, this club gives you such a good feel. Very soft. When you miss on the toe, you can feel the vibration. Love this as it allowed me to really hone in on the good strikes, and know when I missed. Was getting very consistent by the end of the practice session.
Had some really solid shots with the 49* and 53* in my 9 holes today. Great feel, and I have a lot of confidence when hazards are protecting the green.
An update on my Edison 2.0 wedges: I’ve put UST Mamiya Dart V TSPX 105 wedge flex shafts in them. And at first I was struggling with them. I found some Vokey SM8 and SM9 wedges for good prices so I picked them up. DISASTER! I quickly went back to the Edisons. The TK Sole makes all the difference. My wedge game is getting back to decent and I’m sure with work will be back in “good” range. The only downside is that because they’re very soft, the face is getting scratched up thanks to our gritty clay soil at my home course. But they still produce plenty of bite. They’ll be around for quite a while.
[QUOTE=”gkeller813, post: 12285284, member: 51675″]
I’ve always been a Cleveland wedge player, but have really enjoyed the Edisons. In the longer wedge shots they really shine. The consistency has also been really good for me.
[/QUOTE]
I’m currently gaming RTX 6’s in a 49 and 53 and like them but after reading all the glowing reviews on these I finally decided to take the plunge and ordered a 49 and 53 head in the 2.0. I’m like you gonna keep my RTX Full-Face 2 58 as I freaking love that club. My question to you was moving from the Cleveland sole grinds (I play the mid grind) was it a big adjustment to the Koehler sole? Or was it just “better” immediately? I mostly play SoCal muni courses and like Forrest Gump said “it’s like a box of chocolate, you never know what you are gonna get” sometimes I’m playing super tight dry hard stuff and other days its nice and lush. So I have been on a hunt for something really versatile for quite some time.
Also I was wondering how different the feel was with them, I love the forged feel on my Mizunos but the Cleveland’s feel pretty good to me.
I can see the benefit of having more mass further up in the head, and I’m sure my missed greens will improve. I tried playing the CBX wedges awhile ago for this reason, but the soles on those are just massive, face manipulation was not awesome on tight lies with those.
Anyway appreciate you sharing your journey here, helped me take the plunge and try these out.
[QUOTE=”ad_l1b, post: 12565120, member: 78228″]
I’m currently gaming RTX 6’s in a 49 and 53 and like them but after reading all the glowing reviews on these I finally decided to take the plunge and ordered a 49 and 53 head in the 2.0. I’m like you gonna keep my RTX Full-Face 2 58 as I freaking love that club. My question to you was moving from the Cleveland sole grinds (I play the mid grind) was it a big adjustment to the Koehler sole? Or was it just “better” immediately? I mostly play SoCal muni courses and like Forrest Gump said “it’s like a box of chocolate, you never know what you are gonna get” sometimes I’m playing super tight dry hard stuff and other days its nice and lush. So I have been on a hunt for something really versatile for quite some time.
Also I was wondering how different the feel was with them, I love the forged feel on my Mizunos but the Cleveland’s feel pretty good to me.
I can see the benefit of having more mass further up in the head, and I’m sure my missed greens will improve. I tried playing the CBX wedges awhile ago for this reason, but the soles on those are just massive, face manipulation was not awesome on tight lies with those.
Anyway appreciate you sharing your journey here, helped me take the plunge and try these out.
[/QUOTE]
The sole is very versatile to perform in a variety of turf and sand conditions. Didn’t really take me any time to adapt.
I don’t think it was a big adjustment, going to the Kohler sole. I did notice at the beginning, from thick rough the Edison didn’t get through the grass as well as my old RTX-3. But in the end I got used to it, adjusted my swing/stance a bit, and it hasn’t been a problem. I think they’ve done really well from the fairway. I always struggle with soggy ground, and having irons and wedges dig. The Edisons haven’t solved that, but it’s a me problem, not a problem with the wedges. I too play in all sorts of conditions, from hard lies, normal non-soggy fairways, the Edisons have been really good. I think they are really consistent, and just a fantastic wedge for a lot of people. Excited to hear your feedback once you get them on course!
[QUOTE=”ad_l1b, post: 12565120, member: 78228″]
I’m currently gaming RTX 6’s in a 49 and 53 and like them but after reading all the glowing reviews on these I finally decided to take the plunge and ordered a 49 and 53 head in the 2.0. I’m like you gonna keep my RTX Full-Face 2 58 as I freaking love that club. My question to you was moving from the Cleveland sole grinds (I play the mid grind) was it a big adjustment to the Koehler sole? Or was it just “better” immediately? I mostly play SoCal muni courses and like Forrest Gump said “it’s like a box of chocolate, you never know what you are gonna get” sometimes I’m playing super tight dry hard stuff and other days its nice and lush. So I have been on a hunt for something really versatile for quite some time.
Also I was wondering how different the feel was with them, I love the forged feel on my Mizunos but the Cleveland’s feel pretty good to me.
I can see the benefit of having more mass further up in the head, and I’m sure my missed greens will improve. I tried playing the CBX wedges awhile ago for this reason, but the soles on those are just massive, face manipulation was not awesome on tight lies with those.
Anyway appreciate you sharing your journey here, helped me take the plunge and try these out.
[/QUOTE]
I actually did the opposite (Edison to RTX6 mids). I’ve also played the CBX4 since last year.
First off, the CBX and Edison are both cavity backs, but really nothing alike other than that. Edison are much smaller across the board.
As for Edison vs RTX, I think you’ll find it an easy adjustment, assuming you’re not ultra sensitive to tiny changes. I’m not sure I’ll say the sole is outright “better”, but it’s very versatile and I think you’ll find it easy to make many different types of shots in different conditions. I’d miss the HyrdaZip, because that really does work well, but Edison makes a great wedge. Nice feel, perform as advertised.
I do like the Hydrazip and mostly play first thing in the mornings before work so it’s usually dewy, I’m for sure going to pay attention to how these perform out of wet grass compared to the RTX. I just have been noticing I have been hitting shots higher in the face out of the rough and coming up short and wouldn’t mind some protection from that, I’d rather have a long putt than another chip. I messed around with some slightly used Mizuno S23s and was not a fan of the sole designs on there, loved the forged feel, but they could not knock out the RTXs. They are pretty forgiving and spin a lot but the grinds are really subtle and club just doesn’t feel like it moves through the turf correctly.
They are however really forgiving on the toe miss which is huge, and I do believe they have a more centered sweet spot like the RTX 6. I think if Mizuno can improve the grind profile on the S and D grinds those S series wedges will be REALLY good.