Whether you are a long time reader of THP or a more recent consumer of our breadth of releases, reviews, interviews, or brand-stories, you have likely heard the name Terry Koehler and most recently his endeavor founding Edison Golf. We were on top of the story when Terry came back to golf after his hiatus post Hogan Golf with a detailed brand story here from Josh Babbitt as well as a sit down with Terry on Dan Edward’s Off Course Podcast.
The Edison wedges were a continuation on everything we had come to know and expect performance wise from a TK design, from the Koehler Sole to the unique weight placement philosophy, Edison was immediately among the most unique designs on the market. What is more, our forum testing done by golfers just like you showed that they worked well from a variety of skills and applications. So, where does Edison go from there? Why, Edison 2.0 of course.

Edison 2.0 Wedges
Yes, we have seen sequels a fair amount recently in golf, and though at times it feels a bit under-thought from a naming convention aspect, for Edison it aptly describes what is going on. Take what was a rock solid wedge with a unique story, and continue to evolve and tweak it as only Terry Koehler can. There is no wholesale revolution here, Edison is not throwing everything out and starting over, they are seeking to improve and make their designs even more playable for golfers of all skill levels.

When it comes to the Edison 2.0 wedges, there are a lot of changes, both performance based as well as aesthetics and story focused. Aesthetically, the company has moved to a new finish, rather than a traditional chrome plating, the 2.0’s use a glass bead blasted chrome which they call “Pearl Chrome”, and I can tell you with the wedges in hand already as well as a previous user of the 1.0’s, the change is a very good one.
Outside of that, the looks will be mostly familiar to those who used or tried the original wedges. There is some weight movement which we will talk about on its own, but beyond that the paint, ferrules, and engraving style all remain the same. There is a “5X Forged” that has been added to the back of the club which doesn’t signify a change in production processes, but rather to denote to people that these wedges are forged where most of the leaders in the category are cast. This is definitely a feel and precision driven argument by Edison, as subjective as that is, hitting the 2.0’s does offer a shotmaker’s feedback that checks the dense yet pleasing nature of a forged clubhead.

According to Edison, performance wise there has been some tweaking of the Koehler Sole but the biggest changes surround Terry’s belief in designing a wedge that offers forgiveness without sacrificing shot making. It may surprise, but the changes in the Edison 2.0’s are the culmination of multiple years of studying how amateurs hit the golf ball. While you may not always agree with some of the stances which TK takes, you have to respect the fact that he is not at all Tour driven, he is amateur driven trying to look out for everyday golfers like you and me above all else.

The story of how that is being accomplished this time can be seen on the rear of the Edison 2.0 wedges, where there was a cavity look in the originals, there is now a visual double-cavity look which comes from the carving out and movement of 14 to 17 grams of weight depending on the wedge loft in hand. That weight has been moved higher in the clubheads which moves the CG higher and aims to add more forgiveness while creating a flatter trajectory and maximizing spin. This is something (the moving of mass higher) we have indeed seen other manufacturers start to implement, but Edison is quick to comment on the differences:
“I’ve been pursuing dramatic changes in wedge design for over thirty years. While it’s flattering to see all the major brand wedges finally beginning to position a bit more mass higher in their wedge clubheads, none are anywhere close to the EDISON 2.0. In fact, none of today’s wedges are even to the point where my Reid Lockhart® wedges were in the 1990s,” said Koehler. “A caliper measurement comparison of top-of-blade face thicknesses of any major brand wedge to my historic wedge designs proves that I have led this design concept for decades. The EDISON 2.0 wedges are generations ahead of everyone else.”

As I have received 45, 49, 53, and 57 degree Edison 2.0’s in hand for a future full-review to come, I can already comment on the general feel and performance. They are exactly what I would expect from the TK design, the sole is as effective as ever and initial testing has definitely shown the flatter trajectory compared to more “traditional” weighted wedges and impressive spin jumps. Compared to the 1.0’s, there is an initial data difference which we will discuss in time, but the biggest difference for me thus far is in feel through impact. These are thumpy yet crisp, a bit more crisp than the 1.0 on well struck shots in particular, which could have something to do with the additional material removal in these.
The Details
Edison Golf’s new 2.0 wedges will initially be released in odd numbered lofts from 45 to 59 degrees. The plan is eventually to include even lower lofted options (37, 39, 41, 43) and create an even broader set of options for golfers. That addition combined with the offering of only odd numbered lofts aims to further accentuate the differentiation of Edison compared to every other wedge maker out there, though you can request even numbered lofts which will be met by adjusting odd numbered heads. The Edison 2.0 wedges will be priced at $199.95 (steel) and $214.95 (graphite) with various shaft options at release.
For more information, make sure to check out their website at www.edisonwedges.com.




Heard a lot of good things about these wedges. Being a lefty I must live vicariously through the others gaming these until they come out with some lefty models!
my 1.0’s just hit a year old. will have them in the bag in 2024. really like that my iron shafts and wedge shafts are same weight and both are steel. Seems to simplify the game for me
Went to the practice area today to work on my 53* approach shots, from 30 yards and in. I really, really like this club from these distances. The ball flight, not too high, is very easy to control. But the spin is what makes this a weapon. You can go after the pin, directly, and the spin will be there to stop the ball where you need to. Have lots of confidence in this around the green right now, and up to 60 yards way. Just a confidence inspiring club, and delivers.
Glad to have some new testers joining us!
[USER=53320]@MGoBlue[/USER]
[USER=53737]@OldandStiff[/USER]
[USER=68843]@Jtubb17[/USER]
[USER=74075]@skigolfmike[/USER]
[USER=21902]@golfinnut[/USER]
[QUOTE=”gkeller813, post: 11859165, member: 51675″]
Glad to have some new testers joining us!
[USER=53320]@MGoBlue[/USER]
[USER=53737]@OldandStiff[/USER]
[USER=68843]@Jtubb17[/USER]
[USER=74075]@skigolfmike[/USER]
[USER=21902]@golfinnut[/USER]
[/QUOTE]
I’m an old tester, in more ways than one! ?
[QUOTE=”MGoBlue, post: 11859168, member: 53320″]
I’m an old tester, in more ways than one! ?
[/QUOTE]
Ha! So am I :ROFLMAO:
[QUOTE=”MGoBlue, post: 11859168, member: 53320″]
I’m an old tester, in more ways than one! ?
[/QUOTE]
Should have specified haha.
What are you hoping to see from the PW spot in your bag? Is this club someplace you struggle?
I’m excited to see how the comparison goes for you!
[QUOTE=”gkeller813, post: 11859268, member: 51675″]
Should have specified haha.
What are you hoping to see from the PW spot in your bag? Is this club someplace you struggle?
I’m excited to see how the comparison goes for you!
[/QUOTE]
I posted in the other thread too. I’m not looking for anything in particular, just curious to see how the Edison goodness extends into the lower lofted members of the family. No struggles per se with my PW. So I’ll be comparing the two and getting them both on the Trackman at work to get some data.
[QUOTE=”MGoBlue, post: 11859380, member: 53320″]
I posted in the other thread too. I’m not looking for anything in particular, just curious to see how the Edison goodness extends into the lower lofted members of the family. No struggles per se with my PW. So I’ll be comparing the two and getting them both on the Trackman at work to get some data.
[/QUOTE]
When Terry was on Off Course he said a lot about using the Edison in the PW slot in the bag, and the benefits most golfers would see. Seems like he’s putting his wedges up against all comers here. Like that he has the confidence, and like that you’ll be able to a direct head to head comparison. Can’t wait for your data!
I think it will be an interesting comparison. I hit my existing wedge well, so I doubt I see much improvement if any. The things I’d most be looking for are feel and accuracy. I got an email from Edison wanting to have a 15 minute phone conversation. Should be interesting.
I like my 1.0’s but would not consider putting them in my GW or PW spot.
I had my conversation w TK today and it was really good. He’s sending a wedge with the same shaft, length, and grip as my current PW so I’ll be able to test and report on an apples to apples comparison.
[QUOTE=”Acesteve, post: 11860929, member: 47816″]
I like my 1.0’s but would not consider putting them in my GW or PW spot.
[/QUOTE]
I’m actually seeing really good results with my Edison 2.0 in the GW spot, way more consistent and closer to the hole than my previous gamer.
Excited to have more testers on board to see the amazing benefits of these wedges! Now I just need to talk him into making a whole set of irons!
[QUOTE=”MGoBlue, post: 11861016, member: 53320″]
I had my conversation w TK today and it was really good. He’s sending a wedge with the same shaft, length, and grip as my current PW so I’ll be able to test and report on an apples to apples comparison.
[/QUOTE]
I had my convo with TK today and we decided on a path forward. Looking forward to getting the wedge to test. Unfortunately, our weather is turning so the testing will be a challenge. Might have to go to Florida for a few days to get some rounds in.
Just reshafted my 54 and 59 with Nippon 105 wedge shafts. Hopefully can play them tomorrow. Made the change because I went with heavier shafts in the irons and felt I needed to do the same with the finesse wedges.
I got my wedge today. I got a 53* to evaluate up against my 52* Maltby TSR. It’s got a KBS PGI 70 – A Flex shaft. I’ll put it in the bag and see how it performs. The TSR is an 80-85 yard club, hoping this club get a little bit more. Will test with chips, pitches and sand while I’m at it.
[ATTACH type=”full”]9220171[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full”]9220174[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full”]9220175[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”skigolfmike, post: 11894344, member: 74075″]
I got my wedge today. I got a 53* to evaluate up against my 52* Maltby TSR. It’s got a KBS PGI 70 – A Flex shaft. I’ll put it in the bag and see how it performs. The TSR is an 80-85 yard club, hoping this club get a little bit more. Will test with chips, pitches and sand while I’m at it.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_1329.jpeg”]9220171[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_1330.jpeg”]9220174[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_1332.jpeg”]9220175[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Enjoy!
[QUOTE=”MGoBlue, post: 11889216, member: 53320″]
Just reshafted my 54 and 59 with Nippon 105 wedge shafts. Hopefully can play them tomorrow. Made the change because I went with heavier shafts in the irons and felt I needed to do the same with the finesse wedges.
[/QUOTE]
I think I’m going to like the heavier shaft. Seems to help with chips and short pitches. Full swings the ball flight seems a bit lower but still good spin.
I took the 53* wedge to the course today. I hit a few full shots, pitches and chips on the range, plus hit a few sand shots too. It pretty much performed on the range as I expected and it stayed in the bag. On the course I believe I only used it 3 times. I hit it on the first hole with a 77 yard shot, well 7 yards playing 77 uphill. Had a little tail wind too. Figured it was about a 3/4 shot, but I think I only got about 2/3rds and came up a little short. It was a shot out of the rough and it did check up with about 6’ of rollout. I was about 25’ short of the pin. The next shot was a chip and run from 50’ on 6. The feel was pretty good, I did leave it a bit short. It’s a little bit different feel and I can adjust. He 3rd shot was another 75 yard shot on 15 from the fairway. Hit this one the right distance but pushed it about 20’ right. Same deal, hit and checked in about 6’. Conditions are currently pretty soft. I’ll be interested to see how it played when it’s firm and fast.
Today with the 54* I was on from 50-60 yards. I had 4 of 5 shots land with 10 feet of the pin, 2 of those within 5 feet setting up birdies. The only one that didn’t was a bad chunk in a wet area.
Also had 2 of 3 shots from 75-110, with my 49* land within 20 feet, giving me good looks. The other I just didn’t judge the distance correctly.
These are so much fun to hit once you have them dialed in. Easy to get plenty of spin to control distances. Off the fairway lie I used to struggle with bot using the bounce and topping or skulling shots from 100 or so. Now I trust the Edison 2.0 to do the work, and it keeps performing. Great wedges!!
Wanted to point out how much better the Edison has been for me from distances where I expect to get a birdie look. Focusing on shots from 25-50 yards out, where I use my 54*. The Edisons jave helped me get 6 feet closer overall. But a huge improvement from the fairway, from 29 feet to 10!! I’ve always struggled off fairway lies with my shallow swing, which led to many a topped or skulled shot from this distance. But I’ve learned to trust the Edison and the Koehler sole. So much fun to watch the ball fly at the pin, hop, and stop on a dime!
2022:
[ATTACH type=”full”]9231801[/ATTACH]
2023:
[ATTACH type=”full”]9231802[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”Jtubb17, post: 12019162, member: 68843″]
19ft closer is huge! Love to see that
[/QUOTE]
And I’ve gone from a birdie 5% of every hole, to 9% overall. I’m sure this has been a huge reason why. I had 2 birdies last round out because of getting tight with the 54*. I used to get close from 50 yards every so often, but never with such consistency.
Another reminder of how good these wedges can be today. In a round that was wet and muddy, these performed very well. I few issues with the wet ground that I got caught up in, but more often than not the 2.0’s were money from 50-100 yards. Responsible for 2 birdies within the first 5 holes. Great on approach, and the most point and shoot I’ve ever been with wedges. Can’t wait for another year with these in the bag!
Continue to enjoy these wedges. Approach shots were pretty good the last round out. I feel like I’ve gotten a good handle on what 3/4 swings do with each the 49* and 53*, and can adjust in little increments to add or subtract to the distance. I was giving myself more chances, within the 10-15 foot range, for birdies than I have in the past few rounds.
Love the consistency these bring. I prefer the feel on a more traditional wedge, but these are still good. More of a solid feel, versus my preference of something a bit softer. Finish has held up really well through practice, and many rounds of use. I have a lot of confidence in these, and love the weighting and what how it has helped my game.
I bought my first Edison wedge , 55° and I’m absolutely amazed so far , I’ve played Cleveland wedges for over 40 years and these Edison are the best results I’ve ever had , going to fill out my wedge set as soon as I can afford to do so
Another consistent round with the 2.0’s yesterday. I’m really started to enjoy the 53* around the green. I’m getting more comfortable pitching it low, and trusting I’m getting enough spin to hop and then stop, with minimal roll out. I typically use my 58* in this situation, but I’ve found I’m much more consistent keeping it lower. My better shots are closer, and my misses are much less penalizing. Hit 1 or 2 nice approaches from 100 or so out with the 49* as well. Just solid wedges.
53* around the green has become my go to club. Put me in good spots all day for up and downs. Both the 53* and 49* I’ve been trying to keep lower, and when I do I just trust that I’ll get enough spin to hold the greens. And the Edison’s just perform in this regard. I’m more direct on any shot 100 and in, and my accuracy left to right has gotten much better. I’ll still hit a few of them too long with the 49*, which I need to work on, but overall, both of these have been fantastic wedges for me.
Had a great round with the Edison’s last round out. I have come to really enjoy the lower trajectory I get, but the spin that these wedges put on a ball. I am more direct around the green with my 53*, and was 73% up and down last round. So far this season, using my 53* more around the green than my 58*, I’ve improved from an up and down % of 31% in 2024, to 58% so far this season. I’ve played less this year, and don’t expect to always be this high, but still it’s something that has really improved overall.
Like I mentioned, the lower trajectory with higher spin has given me a ton of confidence with I have some green to work with. I feel like my left to right aim is really improved, and with that I’ve been able to focus more on distance control. Last round, with my 53*, I had one chip in from 20 yards. Pin was on the front of the green, so not a ton of green to work with, but this club puts enough spin on the ball that I went for it. Landed it just on the green, the ball checked well, and tracked right into the hole. I had another chip later in the round that stopped within a foot of the pin.
And I don’t want to leave the 49* out either. I typically struggle with distance when i’m grabbing this club, just need to practice more. But, it’s the same as the 53*, where the ball flight it lower, and my left to right dispersion has really improved. I will say I have more issues missing long, than I do short, just need to back it down sometimes and hone in my distances. But, this last round I hit some really good shots, and if I can hone in on my distances, I feel really good about where I’m at, as I’m hitting some really solid shots.