Renren89
Active member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2011
- Messages
- 2,277
- Reaction score
- 14
- Location
- Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
- Handicap
- 20
I don't see this going anywhere. The name "Cleveland Golf" is what is trademarked. That doesn't preclude him from signing his name Roger Cleveland to a product. Plenty of precedence has been set for this as well. Domino's Pizza was sued by Domino's sugar years and years ago on the exact same principle and the only people that got rich was the lawyers. Needless to say, Domino's pizza didn't have to change their name. This just sounds like sour grapes to me, more than anything else. We'll see where it goes though, common sense doesn't always win, and it seldom applies once you get an attorney involved, (sorry manlai and philly!!, You know I like you two. You're two of the GOOD, FRIENDLY, lawyers, LOL).
the difference is that with your example no one is going to confuse a sugar company with a pizza company.
the argument can be made in this case that it can lead to confusion since they are in the same industry