- Admin
- #151
LOL that funny no matter who you are but at least he's not that whiny baby SpiethSo he’s the JT of Spain?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
LOL that funny no matter who you are but at least he's not that whiny baby SpiethSo he’s the JT of Spain?
That's where I think this one will be a better transition, as he's already been suggested to be unhappy with current product with TM.He's a top player so if it's true I get it BUT I don't love it. Oddly we have seen guys switch equipment and it works out terribly so they are taking a chance.
I'm assuming he's testing everything but why not go the Koepka route and play whatever you want? The money still has to be a factor.That's where I think this one will be a better transition, as he's already been suggested to be unhappy with current product with TM.
Kind of like Rosey bouncing back to TaylorMade gear after the Honma departure.
Well, Koepka is probably making stupid money with Nike.. So he's got a bit more freedom there.I'm assuming he's testing everything but why not go the Koepka route and play whatever you want? The money still has to be a factor.
So do you think Rahm will stray from Adidas as well? If not similar situation no?Well, Koepka is probably making stupid money with Nike.. So he's got a bit more freedom there.
...plus with swooshes everywhere, I can't imagine why a club company would be all that eager to sign a guy who shows up four times a year to win.
Great question. I have to think at very least the hat will have his sponsorship on it.So do you think Rahm will stray from Adidas as well? If not similar situation no?
Depends who you ask : )
I don't buy it.
Yup. That’s what they told the public alright.
haha, not me - I just don't think the ball is what would win that one when it's TaylorMade.You guys may have some inside information, that the rest of us don't know! Probably a titch naïve to believe everything you hear!
So do you think Rahm will stray from Adidas as well? If not similar situation no?
Great question. I have to think at very least the hat will have his sponsorship on it.
What are your top 3?haha, not me - I just don't think the ball is what would win that one when it's TaylorMade.
Sure, their balls are solid, but I am not about to personally put them in my top three.
Yeah, but does Rahm present like a guy who fits into the TM or Cuater brand?I think he needs to do more than the hat. Callaway has spent a sh**ton of money on Travis Matthew. Plus, doesn’t Callaway still have its Tour Authentic line?
If Rahm doesn’t wear one of those, it’s not a good sign, especially for TM and Cuater. Makes them look like lesser brands.
Titleist.What are your top 3?
Volvik, Vice and Bridgestone?
I think he needs to do more than the hat. Callaway has spent a sh**ton of money on Travis Matthew. Plus, doesn’t Callaway still have its Tour Authentic line?
If Rahm doesn’t wear one of those, it’s not a good sign, especially for TM and Cuater. Makes them look like lesser brands.
He barely squeezes in to his adidas wear so maybe TM is a better fit. Haha. I think he could be integrated well into TM.Yeah, but does Rahm present like a guy who fits into the TM or Cuater brand?
This surprises me a bitTitleist.
Bridgestone.
Callaway/Srixon.
then maybe TaylorMade?
I kind of think you are in the minority here. Wether I like the guy or not he has serious game, and I think the majority does enjoy watching him. The European influence has got to be huge as well. I am no marketing guy but I find it to be a good move. If he plays the ball I’d invest in Callaway stock now.I think it's easier to take a guy who lets the play do the talking than the guy who wears his emotions on his shoulders (in a negative way).
That said, once again I can absolutely understand the draw of Rahm, he's just not a guy I enjoy watching. His antics and tantrums aren't appealing to me at all.
I put Titleist first, but I don't personally consider them the best ball.This surprises me a bit
Then why put them first? LOLI put Titleist first, but I don't personally consider them the best ball.
I would imagine you're right - and that's probably why I like this discussion so much.I kind of think you are in the minority here. Wether I like the guy or not he has serious game, and I think the majority does enjoy watching him. The European influence has got to be huge as well. I am no marketing guy but I find it to be a good move. If he plays the ball I’d invest in Callaway stock now.
I still won't comment much on signing yay or nay, but do you think the general public knows Callaway even owns Travis Mathew?
Tour Authentic apparel is done by Perry Ellis.
I mean.. You can't ignore what Titleist owns from a marketshare perspective.Then why put them first? LOL
I assume you are referencing tour usage then?
Being an average golfer my list is a tad different. However I’d be happy playing anyone of those 4 brands.Titleist.
Bridgestone.
Callaway/Srixon.
then maybe TaylorMade?
haha, well, the discussion on balls started when someone said selecting a ball over another was the defining factor, and I was genuinely surprised when it was the TaylorMade ball that 'won' it. It's not to say that these are the end all be all of golfers, because I definitely don't agree with that.Being an average golfer my list is a tad different. However I’d be happy playing anyone of those 4 brands.
I mean.. You can't ignore what Titleist owns from a marketshare perspective.
If you talk about 'best ball' and don't immediately say Titleist, homerism is a bit heavy.
Okay...You have probably done the testing to know what is best for you. I think people would understand that if you wanted to put BStones on top.