Scrap Iron
On The Eh Team
I'm going to have to try these. I like everything about them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You're used to 4*? Something tells me it's really not going to be an issue. If it is you can always have lift taken to 48*
Did I hear v-sole? These have my attention. I'm needing a little more iron help these days.
What makes you feel that way? Genuinely curious.I hate to say it....but I think this is a bad move. Srixon/Cleveland should just stick with Srixon for irons. If anything...they should have just updated the Srixon 355s.
I hate to say it....but I think this is a bad move. Srixon/Cleveland should just stick with Srixon for irons. If anything...they should have just updated the Srixon 355s.
I hate to say it....but I think this is a bad move. Srixon/Cleveland should just stick with Srixon for irons. If anything...they should have just updated the Srixon 355s.
What makes you feel that way? Genuinely curious.
For me, it makes a ton of sense. The Cleveland line offers the truly forgiving clubs (and wedges in general as well) while Srixon can now solely be the other end of the spectrum.
What makes you feel that way? Genuinely curious.
For me, it makes a ton of sense. The Cleveland line offers the truly forgiving clubs (and wedges in general as well) while Srixon can now solely be the other end of the spectrum.
I disagree. I think this is a great move - Cleveland covers the average joe/weekend hacker who want to hit the ball straight and have fun, and Srixon covers the blade players who refuse to play anything not forged.
Yes I know that's an exaggeration, but that's how it seems to me. I think it's a smart marketing move on their part to make their lines easy to distinguish from. The price points are solid, and there's no confusion over which line would best suit you.
Yeah, it did work. At the time they then decided to go all in on the Srixon name but the 355 fell on deaf ears imo, and they realized that they had a name (Cleveland) which was well known and received already where those types of irons/clubs (and even more forgiving ones) could land.Did it work the last they time tried it...with the Cleveland Black iron/driver, etc?
Unless you are bringing out a full line like Callaway, Titleist, etc......from a branding perspective an OEM should stick to what they are good at like Cleveland is basically known as a wedge company. Just my opinion.
Why? The 355 irons didn't sell well and the Cleveland name still has as much clout with the casual golfer.
From a golfer perspective, what's the difference? Another choice is good, right?
Yeah, it did work. At the time they then decided to go all in on the Srixon name but the 355 fell on deaf ears imo, and they realized that they had a name (Cleveland) which was well known and received already where those types of irons/clubs (and even more forgiving ones) could land.
I think SRI needs to pick a direction here. They aren't sure what to do with there brands here, and seem to dump all momentum frequently. Everytime Cleveland seems to be taking off they change directions again. Hopefully they let Cleveland run with it after this.
I agree...the price point is solid. But do you think the 565s are blades? I would also say the avg joe/weekend hacker doesn't know the difference or care between forged or cast.
I think SRI needs to pick a direction here. They aren't sure what to do with there brands here, and seem to dump all momentum frequently. Everytime Cleveland seems to be taking off they change directions again. Hopefully they let Cleveland run with it after this.