Cinco
Well-known member
If anyone is worried that the ZX5 is drawn out significantly compared to the ZX7 like a Big Bertha B21, I went to PGASS with my standard Mavrik to compare the two. Photo below, Mavrik on left, ZX5 on the right.
If anything, the ZX5 is shorter from the face to the rear of the crown and appears more squat.
BTW I hit good numbers with this club for me, 14 launch angle, 149 BS, 2300 spin average. Longest drive 297. Mavrik averages we're a little lower for all these stats. Also dispersion was much more tight for the ZX5 compared to Mavrik. It's a lot more forgiving than the Mavrik by far on off center hirs. This was using a AV raw blue 65 for the ZX5 against my Venus 6S blue in the Mavrik.
May have walked out of there with a new driver... just saying.
Now to get a AV blue with a srixon adapter.
Sent from my SM-G998U1 using Tapatalk
If anything, the ZX5 is shorter from the face to the rear of the crown and appears more squat.
BTW I hit good numbers with this club for me, 14 launch angle, 149 BS, 2300 spin average. Longest drive 297. Mavrik averages we're a little lower for all these stats. Also dispersion was much more tight for the ZX5 compared to Mavrik. It's a lot more forgiving than the Mavrik by far on off center hirs. This was using a AV raw blue 65 for the ZX5 against my Venus 6S blue in the Mavrik.
May have walked out of there with a new driver... just saying.
Now to get a AV blue with a srixon adapter.
Sent from my SM-G998U1 using Tapatalk