What's New In The Closet & Apparel Pondering
- Status
- Staff
- #11,227
Matte Grey is AMAZING.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2018
- Messages
- 20,128
- Reaction score
- 28,356
- Handicap
- 18.0
I have never worn Sketchers or Puma shoes until this year. Skechers just in regular shoes and Puma in golf.
I am very impressed with both lines. I could totally understanding the growth in Skechers if their golf shoes are as comfortable as the regular shoes.
For Puma, my NXT spike-less shoes are the best golf shoe I have ever worn.
I expect both of these companies to continue to eat into FJ and Nike market share.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Thread starter
- Admin
- #11,231
Puma X Collection - all of it
Specifically
The Skerries Polo, all the colors
I agree with you. I’m trying to start a thread on it, but airplane WiFi is not cooperating with images. Can you help me?
- Thread starter
- Admin
- #11,235
That’s a nice one Vortex. I got this one from there. Peter Millar.
- Thread starter
- Admin
- #11,237
Yeah it’s last seasons line. But I really liked it and it was on sale. They have a bloody Mary one I like too
I have a weird question and maybe I’m just a big PGA tour honk in this regard.
But, why don’t clothing companies sell your version shirts, even if it’s just online. The shirt Fowler is wearing today is
and I totally rock it with the Grant Thornton, MB logos on there. This goes for a lot of different tour players. Not that I want to rep their sponsors but I’d think even if the individual player sold their own tour shirts, there would be a small market for it out there. I’d forgo the Nike, Adidas, UA stuff. But I’d really like the Peter Millar, FJ, etc etc shirts with the “other logos”.
This happens in every other sport and I’m aware of the “team” aspect but I don’t think most big names are switching apparel brands every couple of years. They might be switching sponsors.....but then that’s just a different shirt to sell. I just think it would add another level of fandom and coolness to their apparel line that some would hate and some would find pretty cool. I’m sure they’re would be legal mumbo jumbo but I’d imagine the sponsors logo on said shirt would help to push the retail price down (they’d subsidize it in retail)
Just thinking out loud here lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But, why don’t clothing companies sell your version shirts, even if it’s just online. The shirt Fowler is wearing today is
and I totally rock it with the Grant Thornton, MB logos on there. This goes for a lot of different tour players. Not that I want to rep their sponsors but I’d think even if the individual player sold their own tour shirts, there would be a small market for it out there. I’d forgo the Nike, Adidas, UA stuff. But I’d really like the Peter Millar, FJ, etc etc shirts with the “other logos”. This happens in every other sport and I’m aware of the “team” aspect but I don’t think most big names are switching apparel brands every couple of years. They might be switching sponsors.....but then that’s just a different shirt to sell. I just think it would add another level of fandom and coolness to their apparel line that some would hate and some would find pretty cool. I’m sure they’re would be legal mumbo jumbo but I’d imagine the sponsors logo on said shirt would help to push the retail price down (they’d subsidize it in retail)
Just thinking out loud here lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Thread starter
- Admin
- #11,241
I have a weird question and maybe I’m just a big PGA tour honk in this regard.
But, why don’t clothing companies sell your version shirts, even if it’s just online. The shirt Fowler is wearing today is
This happens in every other sport and I’m aware of the “team” aspect but I don’t think most big names are switching apparel brands every couple of years. They might be switching sponsors.....but then that’s just a different shirt to sell. I just think it would add another level of fandom and coolness to their apparel line that some would hate and some would find pretty cool. I’m sure they’re would be legal mumbo jumbo but I’d imagine the sponsors logo on said shirt would help to push the retail price down (they’d subsidize it in retail)
Just thinking out loud here lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Permissions to use another logo.
And...who pays who for the "advertising"
Well not every player has logos. Rickie and Phil do, amongst a few others. I’d say the sponsors would pay for the extra advertising to an extent. But the actual cost of those logos ending up on the clothing is minimal. So just like any other advertising deal they pay a flat fee I’d think. It would be a limited run and maybe not sold on (Puma’s website) maybe it’s something the player agrees to with the apparel company that they can sell their own tour line on their own personal website and a portion goes to charity. Puma gets their money, the sponsors get a bit more advertising, the player gets people to their website and they get to donate some coin to a great charity?
Maybe I’m nuts. Lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Thread starter
- Admin
- #11,243
I think you might be in the minority : )
You are right, not every player does. Check out Nike players...
This is the main reason why the apparel company wouldn’t mass produce them. It would be a “fan” item so to speak.
Then again if the exact same shirt with no logos is already available....
Never mind. Nothing to see here. Only on my first cup of coffee.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The Billy Horschel Octopus pants from the US Open years ago I could never find and it drove me nuts!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Thread starter
- Admin
- #11,246
That was your partners hiding them from your websites so you could not do that to yourself
- Moderator
- #11,248
Wish these fit me
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
I think I'd wear those.
- Moderator
- #11,250
haha I wish. Maybe in high school.
- Status