So far in 2024, PING Golf has been quite busy when it comes to irons, but believe it or not, business is about to pick up even more starting today with two new irons joining the fray. First up, things are getting hollow with the PING i530 seeing the brand try to form an even larger presence in the hollow-body players distance style iron.

PING i530 Irons
Now more than ever, it seems that PING is embracing the realities of golf club design trends and what consumers want. There is no better example of that than the brand evolving their take on the hollow-body clubhead. The i530’s are PING’s effort to create a well machined iron head that uses a 17-4 Stainless Steel body that has a forged maraging steel C300 face to create a profile they believe that even blade lovers will enjoy but offers a lot more firepower.

Internally, the hollow cavity is filled with a polymer which seeks to dampen the feedback while still allowing the face to flex as much as possible, a formula that you are no doubt familiar with by now as most companies have this type of design in their arsenal. For PING, they are touting that the actual 17-4 body design helps the face flex, and it accentuates it by moving the CG to locations where impact occurs on each club.

The aim here is better feel with higher speed that still offers ample fitting potential. To aid in that, PING is implementing their three-loft configuration option (Standard, Power, Retro) so that launch and flight windows can be optimized for each golfer. The fact that the face flexes more than the i525 is the biggest story, but the aesthetics are sure to be discussed as well with not only a better overall look but a new machining process allowing more consistency than ever from PING.
The Details
The PING i530 irons will be available in 4-PW and UW in three different loft options. They will come standard with True Temper DG Mid 100/115 or PING Alta CB Black graphite shafts. As always, there are many optional shaft choices available as well. The i530’s will be priced at $205/club for steel and $220/club for graphite.
For more information, check out their website at www.ping.com.
[QUOTE=”mantan, post: 12600200, member: 51648″]
My fitter also gives lessons and has gotten my swing back on track. He fit me for woods and iron shafts, but I’ve played Srixon irons for years and have always been a ‘cold dead hand’ thing for me.
Today he gently told me that he thinks a different style iron would give me better interaction/spin rates. The soles are good for many things – but not the best fit for everyone.
Just for fun, he had me hit a different iron style (T-150). Impact was totally different. I was a bit shocked.
He told me he thought the i530s would be an outstanding fit for me. I haven’t even considered other irons, other than a very brief and failed stint with the Mizuno JPX 825s last year.
These are intriguing. Especially to hear from a former ZX5 owner…
I am a little concerned about the stock lofts. I am happy with my distances and not trying to nuke a 42* pitching wedge 35 yards longer than my 48* gap wedge…
[/QUOTE]
Can always retro loft them.
[QUOTE=”Golfers Anonymous, post: 12600206, member: 59233″]
Can always retro loft them.
[/QUOTE]
Great call. I love the lofts on the retrospec! I would seriously think about a 7-U in the traditional spec. I’d consider a 5-U or 6-U in traditoinal….
[QUOTE=”Golfers Anonymous, post: 12600206, member: 59233″]
Can always retro loft them.
[/QUOTE]
The irons themselves gap well. Its the transition of 48 degree to 52. Its about 20 yards for me. Retro spec works for this just make sure you know the gaps to the next wedge.
I got fit for Ping i530 irons at 2nd Swing in Wilmington, DE into 6i-UW with UST Recoil Dart 75R. Playing them since July 4 and really happy.
[I]Finally[/I]. I’ve been trying [I]for years[/I] to find a good replacement for “old faithful”, my 2013 Ping i20 w/CFS steel shafts. Got Titleist T-200 w/KBS Tour Lite steel shafts last fall. Loved them, but the KBS steel shafts really made my joints hurt. Got into Callaway Apex Pro with MMT 85 graphite shafts this spring and learned “I’m just not that good”. Not my skill level.
The combination of i530 + Dart 75 work for me. Very satisfied.
The question mark for me was decent angle and gapping. I’d never had irons with these lofts. Happy to report 43° decent angle on 6i, 44° on 7i, 45° with 8i and about 5 mph ballspeed difference between those clubs. Am consistently finding both my pitch mark and ball on the green. Improving GIR was my goal all along and am seeing it. These irons seem to produce straighter ball flight than any other I’ve tried (including my trusty old i20s). Definitely the most distance too. Am finding they give me more confidence to “swing away!” and hit my yardage. I’m enjoying this more confident full swing feeling.
The UW is 47° which gave me a 30 yard gap to my 54° wedge. Solved by adding a 50° Callaway Opus W grind. Really like that club too! Bounce works for me. My personal “trick” is to rename the Ping wedges as my 10i, 11i, instead of W and U. So the 50° becomes my 12i. That’s how I labeled them in Arccos for tracking. I swing them like irons more often than partial swings, like a wedge. Keeps me from freaking out about having so many wedges in my bag. (Sigh, have a ChipR too)
For context, am 18 HCP with a 74 mph 7i clubhead speed.
[QUOTE=”psteiner, post: 12600313, member: 1740″]
I got fit for Ping i530 irons at 2nd Swing in Wilmington, DE into 6i-UW with UST Recoil Dart 75R. Playing them since July 4 and really happy.
[I]Finally[/I]. I’ve been trying [I]for years[/I] to find a good replacement for “old faithful”, my 2013 Ping i20 w/CFS steel shafts. Got Titleist T-200 w/KBS Tour Lite steel shafts last fall. Loved them, but the KBS steel shafts really made my joints hurt. Got into Callaway Apex Pro with MMT 85 graphite shafts this spring and learned “I’m just not that good”. Not my skill level.
The combination of i530 + Dart 75 work for me. Very satisfied.
The question mark for me was decent angle and gapping. I’d never had irons with these lofts. Happy to report 43° decent angle on 6i, 44° on 7i, 45° with 8i and about 5 mph ballspeed difference between those clubs. Am consistently finding both my pitch mark and ball on the green. Improving GIR was my goal all along and am seeing it. These irons seem to produce straighter ball flight than any other I’ve tried (including my trusty old i20s). Definitely the most distance too. Am finding they give me more confidence to “swing away!” and hit my yardage. I’m enjoying this more confident full swing feeling.
The UW is 47° which gave me a 30 yard gap to my 54° wedge. Solved by adding a 50° Callaway Opus W grind. Really like that club too! Bounce works for me. My personal “trick” is to rename the Ping wedges as my 10i, 11i, instead of W and U. So the 50° becomes my 12i. That’s how I labeled them in Arccos for tracking. I swing them like irons more often than partial swings, like a wedge. Keeps me from freaking out about having so many wedges in my bag. (Sigh, have a ChipR too)
For context, am 18 HCP with a 74 mph 7i clubhead speed.
[/QUOTE]
Congrats on finding something that works. I hit mine on the range a little bit ago. Love the irons… not the wedges so much. I struggle with controlling the distances on partial shots. The forgiveness on the irons is excellent
This set is such a struggle for me. Today in the simulator I hit 10 of 10 greens playing knock down shots with a 5 iron at 200 yards. Full swing is a pretty simple 215 and is allowing me to free up another wedge spot in the bag. There is considerable overlap with the Ai Smoke 4H at 20 degrees. The king Tec OG at 19 degrees is a 225-230 carry. I’m going to test hybrids and see if I can find one that works in the role of both of these hybrids.
Talked with [USER=62865]@Scooby45[/USER] and we both seem to think a great way forward is to get a Cleveland CBX Zipcore at 50 degrees and then two wedges below it. This should really gap my bag well and allow me to get wedges going into the Bag Boy Championship at Ballyhack.
First real iron swings in two weeks. Still super easy to hit and launch throughout. Worked hard on distance control with the wedges. Going to take a good bit more work outside but options are: Trade the irons and start over when I actually really like the middle and longer irons. Or, put in the work. I’m just gonna work. I think I can really make these work a full season.
Well when I played the i530 I had nothing bad to say about them as maybe the Axiom shafts made a difference I don’t know. I do miss them but I was not as constant with my long irons as I would have like as I didn’t put in the time and at my age I decided to go with GI (Game enjoyment) irons. So many great brands out there as I’m very pleased with my complete over haul as everything I now have is some of the very best of everything to ever come out so it’s now all up to me as how well I play.
I’m all set as this is the first time I have had a complete bag all new stuff by the end of January. I’m sure there are other brands out there that perform just as well but what I have are some of the most easiest clubs to hit and I’m sure what I have will help me to play some of the best golf of my life even at my age. All of my gapping match so well for me and the weight of my shafts are exactly what I needed from lightest to heaviest as my grip and shafts match by brand for my woods, my hybrids with grip to shafts all match, irons went with Axiom 75 R and wedges I have MMT 85 R with same matching grips. The only odd clubs are my putters as I wanted to try something different. I like switching from a blade to a mallet and vice versa. So 2025 is a year I plan on playing more golf especially now since I’m now playing GI Game Enjoyment irons.
[QUOTE=”hedley_lamarr08, post: 12905363, member: 37622″]
First real iron swings in two weeks. Still super easy to hit and launch throughout. Worked hard on distance control with the wedges. Going to take a good bit more work outside but options are: Trade the irons and start over when I actually really like the middle and longer irons. Or, put in the work. I’m just gonna work. I think I can really make these work a full season.
[/QUOTE]
I was hitting the G440 irons in the retro spec fitting head yesterday. Want to love the i530 but the 6i scares me (smallish to my eye) I am gaming a 6h right now for sim rounds and love it. If it works out on the real course it would open up more 7i-GW options. The odd thing is this shophas a used set of i525 irons and I’m hitting it better than the 530 numbers wise. And I think it’s due to the weaker lofts. So I’m debating ordering a set of 525s in std lofts or 530 or 440s in retro lofts.
Gotta go with what works. No shame in that thought
[QUOTE=”hedley_lamarr08, post: 12906118, member: 37622″]
Gotta go with what works. No shame in that thought
[/QUOTE]
That’s the issue, though,lol is I am not really sure what works best for my game. My best ever round of -2 was with a set of i200 irons. And then my next best round was one over par with G425 irons. So I never quite sure if I should be playing i or G series. ?
[QUOTE=”erock9174, post: 12906340, member: 7797″]
That’s the issue, though,lol is I am not really sure what works best for my game. My best ever round of -2 was with a set of i200 irons. And then my next best round was one over par with G425 irons. So I never quite sure if I should be playing i or G series. ?
[/QUOTE]
On the i200s. I’d buy a set if I could get them new right now. No questions asked.
The mid irons are great in the i530. 9-UW are hot. The problem is, I can’t beat these in a fitting in a monitor. I’ve tried. I’ve had some equal but not beat. I loved the i230 short irons. Hated the mids.
The G440 have the same spec as the i530. I’ll hit them tomorrow for entertainment
[QUOTE=”hedley_lamarr08, post: 12906354, member: 37622″]
On the i200s. I’d buy a set if I could get them new right now. No questions asked.
The mid irons are great in the i530. 9-UW are hot.
[/QUOTE]
Have you thought about bending the nine through U wedge in the 530s a couple degrees weak ? Be a cheap and easy experiment.
[QUOTE=”erock9174, post: 12907482, member: 7797″]
Have you thought about bending the nine through U wedge in the 530s a couple degrees weak ? Be a cheap and easy experiment.
[/QUOTE]
I have but I worry about creating added gaps in the middle of the bag
[QUOTE=”erock9174, post: 12906102, member: 7797″]
I was hitting the G440 irons in the retro spec fitting head yesterday. Want to love the i530 but the 6i scares me (smallish to my eye) I am gaming a 6h right now for sim rounds and love it. If it works out on the real course it would open up more 7i-GW options. The odd thing is this shophas a used set of i525 irons and I’m hitting it better than the 530 numbers wise. And I think it’s due to the weaker lofts. So I’m debating ordering a set of 525s in std lofts or 530 or 440s in retro lofts.
[/QUOTE]
I have two sets of 525’s. Very happy with them
Tried the Srixon ZXi4 yet?
If not, go demo.
Better feel, better distance, better look at address, just as forgiving as G440.
[QUOTE=”Desmond, post: 12914566, member: 24109″]
Tried the Srixon ZXi4 yet?
If not, go demo.
Better feel, better distance, better look at address, just as forgiving as the G440
[/QUOTE]
Yeah I hit them last week. Looked sharp and great at address, perfect size, but just like the prior two generations, not enough launch and spin for me unfortunately. This is one iron I wished Srixon made in an HL version. Their rep told me that last year as well. He said the ZX4’s could fit such a bigger demographic for them, if they had a weaker lofted more higher launching/spinning profile option.
I’m surprised the G440’s would work for you but I guess a retro loft would work, and as you know, one can weaken the Srixons by 2 degrees. But the i230’s have plenty of spin if you require spin.
[QUOTE=”Desmond, post: 12914746, member: 24109″]
I’m surprised the G440’s would work for you but I guess a retro loft would work, and as you know, one can weaken the Srixons by 2 degrees. But the i230’s have plenty of spin if you require spin.
[/QUOTE]
Most shops this year have the 440 in a “retro” spec 7i fitting head which is cool. So I have been able to see my numbers with it and its been really solid.
Agree on the Srixons with weakening them but it’s still a gamble if the numbers would be right for me.. I wish Srixon and other oems would include a fitting head that is 2* weak and *2 strong for those that need loft adjustments.
agree on the 230s. I hit it the other day but the max height came down around 20′ from the 440 in retro and while spin went up around 800 rpms I lost a full club of distance.
Also the 230 head is just a hair on the smaller looking side to my eye. I feel like the 440 size is in that sweet spot for me. Not overly large, not overly small.
[QUOTE=”erock9174, post: 12914932, member: 7797″]
Most shops this year have the 440 in a “retro” spec 7i fitting head which is cool. So I have been able to see my numbers with it and its been really solid.
Agree on the Srixons with weakening them but it’s still a gamble if the numbers would be right for me.. I wish Srixon and other oems would include a fitting head that is 2* weak and *2 strong for those that need loft adjustments.
agree on the 230s. I hit it the other day but the max height came down around 20′ from the 440 in retro and while spin went up around 800 rpms I lost a full club of distance.
Also the 230 head is just a hair on the smaller looking side to my eye. I feel like the 440 size is in that sweet spot for me. Not overly large, not overly small.
[/QUOTE]
Well, you are correct on all counts, of course. I was just getting about a consistent 5 yds more carry with the Srixon i4 7i with probably too much rollout – 5-6 yards. BUT I wasn’t using my ball and I am working to compress to get more spin. Ever since the Mizuno hollow bodies came out, I’ve been worried about lack of spin, but I decided to go with a shaft that is 25 less grams that I am currently using to pick up more speed. Before my med issues, I was compressing nicely – but getting back to it now.
I will leave since this is an i530 discussion – the only issues I’ve heard are a bit on feel and the regular complaints about hollow bodies (inconsistent in shorter irons). But have a friend with the 530s – he likes the distance.
[QUOTE=”hedley_lamarr08, post: 12906354, member: 37622″]
On the i200s. I’d buy a set if I could get them new right now. No questions asked.
The mid irons are great in the i530. 9-UW are hot. The problem is, I can’t beat these in a fitting in a monitor. I’ve tried. I’ve had some equal but not beat. I loved the i230 short irons. Hated the mids.
The G440 have the same spec as the i530. I’ll hit them tomorrow for entertainment
[/QUOTE]
I loved the i200s also. I have been looking at the Maltby Playability Factors lately out of curiosity and I know there are mixed views on them but the i200 is more forgiving based on that than the i210, i230 or any of the i5xx family.
Interestingly the Blueprint S scores pretty high from an MPF perspective for the category it is designed for.
[QUOTE=”Chef23, post: 12915119, member: 48542″]
I loved the i200s also. I have been looking at the Maltby Playability Factors lately out of curiosity and I know there are mixed views on them but the i200 is more forgiving based on that than the i210, i230 or any of the i5xx family.
Interestingly the Blueprint S scores pretty high from an MPF perspective for the category it is designed for.
[/QUOTE]
The reason the 200 has a higher MPF, is because the CG is lower in the head which Maltby likes Also, the C dimension I believe is a little further from the hosel than those other irons as well because it has a little bit longer blade length. It seems Ping’s M.O. has been to slightly decrease the length of the blade length on their irons year over year
[QUOTE=”erock9174, post: 12915149, member: 7797″]
The reason the 200 has a higher MPF, is because the CG is lower in the head which Maltby likes Also, the C dimension I believe is a little further from the hosel than those other irons as well because it has a little bit longer blade length. It seems Ping’s M.O. has been to slightly decrease the length of the blade length on their irons year over year
[/QUOTE]
I did a fitting a number of years ago when I had the i200s and the i210s were fairly new. I got much better results from the i200s. Maybe the things the MPF favors work for me.
Solid performance from the irons in the simulator today. Not much new to report with my focus on fairways. Trying to dial in the swing a bit and take some distance off to make the control of the short irons way easier. This may or may not work. Time will tell.