mikedean441
6X HOF
Yep but children have nothing to do with it
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
We will see who wins at tax time
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yep but children have nothing to do with it
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Huh? One of the guys shirts said police on the back, the other had a radio holster, so I will assume security or police one.If mall security is asking you to leave, you e don't something wrong. Plus they are hired by the mall. The guy in the green fleece in seat 18b doesn't have the right to remove you. It's not like the head stewardess deputized him or something.
I'd love to see how people would react if they were forced to give up their seat and had some place to be.
We will see who wins at tax time
Police was written on one of the guys back, so I do believe that assumption was wrong.Pretty much this. Threaten to ban him from future flights, but to get physical with him*, nah ... not ok with it.
*I'm running under the assumption that this was United personnel, not the police. The whole thing was a cluster.
Well if they don't get on, there will be 180 paying passengers not going anywhere at the next stop.I think the real question should be are those United employees that were added to the flight which forced these 4 off more important than the 4 paying passengers?
Huh? One of the guys shirts said police on the back, the other had a radio holster, so I will assume security or police one.
Well if they don't get on, there will be 180 paying passengers not going anywhere at the next stop.
If mall security is asking you to leave, you e don't something wrong. Plus they are hired by the mall. The guy in the green fleece in seat 18b doesn't have the right to remove you. It's not like the head stewardess deputized him or something.
I'd love to see how people would react if they were forced to give up their seat and had some place to be.
I think the real question should be are those United employees that were added to the flight which forced these 4 off more important than the 4 paying passengers?
The guy in the back had police written on his back, so no doubt he is police or at least security with police powers. The other dude is wearing a radio holster, I've never seen a regular dude with one. I would guess he is plain clothes security or leo if some kind.The man dragging him down the aisle looks like a reg. dude. The guy in back had keys hanging off his belt. To me it's looks like a passenger dragged him off.
There are police all over the airport. They could have called them and done it right. But I'm not going to go round and round. I think it was wrong, other have no issue with it, kewl!
The guy in the back had police written on his back, so no doubt he is police or at least security with police powers. The other dude is wearing a radio holster, I've never seen a regular dude with one. I would guess he is plain clothes security or leo if some kind.
Don't disagree, I said originally United shared some responsibility in letting it get to this, but there is no excuse for this dude making them drag him off.guess the moral of the story is for the airlines to stop effing overbooking.
... for those who signed up for the debate forum.already posted, theres another thread with all the action already
... for those who signed up for the debate forum.
... for those who signed up for the debate forum.
Is there a secret forum that I don't know about?!