Today Srixon unveils the latest update to one of their more popular golf balls. No, this isn’t about the Z-star line. Instead, the focus is squarely placed on the newest version of the Soft Feel.
“This is our 12th generation SOFT FEEL golf ball, putting us at the forefront of the low-compression distance ball category,” said Brian Schielke, Marketing Director at Srixon. “With this new model, we’re excited to give golfers our longest SOFT FEEL to date, in a ball that maintains the signature feel golfers expect from a SOFT FEEL.”
With this Soft Feel release, Srixon has completed its phasing out of the Energetic Gradient Growth Core in favor of their more modern FastLayer Core. This move is not surprising at all as we’ve seen Srixon graduate to this core in the 2020 Q-Star Tour, and most recently announcing the FastLayer Core in the 2nd generation of the Soft Feel Brite. It ensures that when a golfer purchases a Srixon golf ball, be of the Z-Star, Q-Star, or Soft Feel variety, the core technology is of the same ilk, with this version being the softest of the bunch. Srixon has said this core will add ball speed because of its increased resiliency. Golfers will also enjoy a bit less side spin in the longer clubs, which should help improve their accuracy. Faster, longer, and straighter all sound like a pretty appealing option.
With a name like Soft Feel, this ball comes with some expectations because nobody wants to play a ball known as Soft Feel if it feels like a rock. That would be false advertising. Partnering with the low compression core is a soft, thin cover. This cover helps provide the feel that one should expect from this ball, but it also helps offer up a bit more spin into the greens. As we’ve tested in the past, Soft Feel spins enough on full shots, but falls short of Z-Star and Q-Star Tour when it comes to those partial wedge shots. We will be following up with some results of this current lineup in the near future.
Starting today, Soft Feel and Soft Feel Lady are available for purchase for $21.99. There are three color options to choose from, including Soft White, Tour Yellow, and Passion Pink. For the golfer who wants a good performing golf ball that packs incredible feel for a wallet-friendly price, Soft Feel is well worth a try.
More information on the 12th generation of Soft Feel can be found at www.srixon.com.
The Details
Available: Now
Price: 21.99
Color: Soft White
Tour Yellow
Passion Pink
weather permitting this weekend I’m going to try to gather some data on Soft Feel, QST, and Z Star(maybe the XV). Should be able to get some course time too which is exciting. I know two-piece balls aren’t the rage, but hell it doesn’t mean we can’t get solid performance from them. Hell, my PB at my old course was shot with a Pinnacle Soft.
[QUOTE=”ddec, post: 9501825, member: 782″]
weather permitting this weekend I’m going to try to gather some data on Soft Feel, QST, and Z Star(maybe the XV). Should be able to get some course time too which is exciting. I know two-piece balls aren’t the rage, but hell it doesn’t mean we can’t get solid performance from them. Hell, my PB at my old course was shot with a Pinnacle Soft.
[/QUOTE]
I wanted to do the same test and also include the QStar. Please let us know your thoughts.
Thank you and hit them straight!
[QUOTE=”ddec, post: 9501825, member: 782″]
weather permitting this weekend I’m going to try to gather some data on Soft Feel, QST, and Z Star(maybe the XV). Should be able to get some course time too which is exciting. I know two-piece balls aren’t the rage, but hell it doesn’t mean we can’t get solid performance from them. Hell, my PB at my old course was shot with a Pinnacle Soft.
[/QUOTE]
Been quite a while since I played a soft feel ball but they always performed well and looking forward to some data.
[QUOTE=”Landy, post: 9501862, member: 21078″]
I wanted to do the same test and also include the QStar. Please let us know your thoughts.
Thank you and hit them straight!
[/QUOTE]
I don’t think I have any of the latest-gen Q-star. That ball honestly kind of confuses me in their lineup. A side by side with that could be interesting though.
[QUOTE=”ddec, post: 9501880, member: 782″]
I don’t think I have any of the latest-gen Q-star. That ball honestly kind of confuses me in their lineup. A side by side with that could be interesting though.
[/QUOTE]
No worries go with what you have. To me the QST is Srixons RX and the QS is their e12. Thats my guess. Just a big fan of Srixon…
The pink is well….pink
[ATTACH type=”full”]8962312[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=”ddec, post: 9509066, member: 782″]
The pink is well….pink
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”6E697205-6FAC-46DE-A12F-A8E28F05DCC0.jpeg”]8962312[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Have you seen the new yellow yet? Still taxi cab yellow? Which I love. I also like the green numbers on the white ball.
[QUOTE=”Carolina Golfer, post: 9509174, member: 44136″]
Have you seen the new yellow yet? Still taxi cab yellow? Which I love. I also like the green numbers on the white ball.
[/QUOTE]
I haven’t, but I like the yellow on the QST.
[QUOTE=”ddec, post: 9509824, member: 782″]
I haven’t, but I like the yellow on the QST.
[/QUOTE]
I find the yellow on the QST sparkly. I prefer the yellow on the Soft Feel.
[QUOTE=”Carolina Golfer, post: 9509873, member: 44136″]I find the yellow on the QST sparkly. I prefer the yellow on the Soft Feel.[/QUOTE]
they do tend to be more sparkly than the soft feel. I still have some previous gen yellow soft feel too.
I bought a dozen of these in Yellow and put them in play today.
I could honestly say I am ready to make the switch and play this ball full time!!!!! I was super impressed with the performance of this ball today especially considering it was 38° for our scramble tourney.
I played back a tee box today from where I normally do and was seeing tee shots get to where I normally would from the forward box I normally play. I am assuming this is from being able to compress the ball a bit more and less spin off the driver. Just nice straight high shots, no ballooning at all.
On iron approach shots I was quite surprised to see the ball staying very close to the ball mark on most all my shots. I would say within 3 feet of the ball mark on most all of them. I also noticed some increased distance with my irons also.
I was rolling the TT Ten putter today and the ball felt really good off the insert. Rolled very true and distance control was quite good with it
You may have noticed I skipped how it did around the greens, we didn’t have many chips around the green.
The few we did have is a area that I did notice the difference in how much it might run out compared to my normal ball the 2020 CS. Now these are 2 different covered balls and by no means an apple to apple comparison in any way.
What I will say though is that there is some good performance around the green and one would need to allow for a bit more rollout. This is something that you could adjust to pretty easily I think.
This ball impressed me from the first tee shot today and I am going to play this thru the rest of the year and see how it does. Hopefully we still have some warmer days to play and see if the performance will be better in warmer temps.
[QUOTE=”Snickerdog, post: 9579588, member: 38739″]
I bought a dozen of these in Yellow and put them in play today.
I could honestly say I am ready to make the switch and play this ball full time!!!!! I was super impressed with the performance of this ball today especially considering it was 38° for our scramble tourney.
I played back a tee box today from where I normally do and was seeing tee shots get to where I normally would from the forward box I normally play. I am assuming this is from being able to compress the ball a bit more and less spin off the driver. Just nice straight high shots, no ballooning at all.
On iron approach shots I was quite surprised to see the ball staying very close to the ball mark on most all my shots. I would say within 3 feet of the ball mark on most all of them. I also noticed some increased distance with my irons also.
I was rolling the TT Ten putter today and the ball felt really good off the insert. Rolled very true and distance control was quite good with it
You may have noticed I skipped how it did around the greens, we didn’t have many chips around the green.
The few we did have is a area that I did notice the difference in how much it might run out compared to my normal ball the 2020 CS. Now these are 2 different covered balls and by no means an apple to apple comparison in any way.
What I will say though is that there is some good performance around the green and one would need to allow for a bit more rollout. This is something that you could adjust to pretty easily I think.
This ball impressed me from the first tee shot today and I am going to play this thru the rest of the year and see how it does. Hopefully we still have some warmer days to play and see if the performance will be better in warmer temps.
[/QUOTE]
Awesome Write-up SD.
Great to see the distance gains for you. i’ve made the switch to other Srixon balls for my gamers, but I think you make a compelling case for my offseason ball
[QUOTE=”OITW, post: 9579599, member: 20929″]
Awesome Write-up SD.
Great to see the distance gains for you. i’ve made the switch to other Srixon balls for my gamers, but I think you make a compelling case for my offseason ball
[/QUOTE]
I played Q-Star Tour for a year but the one thing that got me was it felt hot off the face of the putter, this has a softer feel and just feel right to me.
I was really shocked at the distance gains and like it.
Definitely give it a go.
Budget golf has these on sale buy 2 get 1 free. 🙂
[QUOTE=”Badger_Golfer, post: 9496671, member: 174″]
I love Srixon but I wish they would stop trying to push the agenda that soft balls give you more distance. Not only does it not spring off the face at impact to give you more distance, you actually lose ball speed and distance with a softer ball.
I do love the soft feel of balls like this but more distance? Nope.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=”gmiller598, post: 9496683, member: 24338″]
you must not be a slow swinger.
[/QUOTE]
Oh, I’m a much slower swinger than I used to be. I’d estimate my fastest Driver swing to be no more than 90 MPH.
This reminds me very much of the velocity vs mass argument in archery hunting. Some people were on the side of maximum speed with the lightest arrow possible. Some people were on the side of heavy, slow arrows. Truth is, the sweet spot was in between those two extremes. At that point momentum, and with it kinetic energy, was at it’s maximum.
Two or three years ago I bought a dozen Wilson Duo golf balls that advertised a ridiculously low compression number on either the package, or on the in store POS. They felt great! They were as soft as marshmallows. They also didn’t go anywhere! There are so many choices these days, it kind of depends on how much money you have to throw away on bad ball purchases!
FWIW, the best feeling ball I’ve hit in the last few years was a found Taylor Made TP5! It felt wonderful coming off the club face, and flew like a rocket! I really regretted losing that ball. The only problem was that they were as expensive as Pro-V1’s! But, they’re on sale now! Hmmmmm!
[QUOTE=”Buckeyegolfnut, post: 9600678, member: 59057″]
Oh, I’m a much slower swinger than I used to be. I’d estimate my fastest Driver swing to be no more than 90 MPH.
This reminds me very much of the velocity vs mass argument in archery hunting. Some people were on the side of maximum speed with the lightest arrow possible. Some people were on the side of heavy, slow arrows. Truth is, the sweet spot was in between those two extremes. At that point momentum, and with it kinetic energy, was at it’s maximum.
Two or three years ago I bought a dozen Wilson Duo golf balls that advertised a ridiculously low compression number on either the package, or on the in store POS. They felt great! They were as soft as marshmallows. They also didn’t go anywhere! There are so many choices these days, it kind of depends on how much money you have to throw away on bad ball purchases!
FWIW, the best feeling ball I’ve hit in the last few years was a found Taylor Made TP5! It felt wonderful coming off the club face, and flew like a rocket! I really regretted losing that ball. The only problem was that they were as expensive as Pro-V1’s! But, they’re on sale now! Hmmmmm!
[/QUOTE]
Im with you. I used to buy into the notion of soft golf balls because I loved how they felt but they had no distance and not much spin. I tried the Duos and loved them but the performance just wasn’t there. Ive tried the Maxfli Softfli, same thing. I then went to some firmer, tour balls and found that I got the distance back that I lost.
Im sure that soft golf balls sell because people love how they feel but for me the performance just isn’t there. ???? Not to mention the science just isn’t there to prove that softer golf balls spring off the clubface more than firmer ones do. People can argue it all they want but show me facts and science, not claims and half truths and I’ll believe it.
Played this ball today, was 43 at tee time. Great performance off the tee, on approach shots I was seeing minimal rollout (2-4 feet at most). I had some green side chips with a 58° wedge that the ball hopped and stopped on me which surprise [USER=38120]@shanewu[/USER].
Durability wise these are great. Even with some really good wedge contact I didn’t notice any scuffing of the ball.
[QUOTE=”Snickerdog, post: 9706645, member: 38739″]
Played this ball today, was 43 at tee time. Great performance off the tee, on approach shots I was seeing minimal rollout (2-4 feet at most). I had some green side chips with a 58° wedge that the ball hopped and stopped on me which surprise [USER=38120]@shanewu[/USER].
Durability wise these are great. Even with some really good wedge contact I didn’t notice any scuffing of the ball.
[/QUOTE]
I’ve played the Soft Feel a few times, not a bad ball. To me, they’re almost 100% interchangeable with the Callaway Supersoft. Surlyn covers get knocked for lack of spin all the time, but both the Soft Feel and Supersoft perform well enough around the green for me. I don’t have the kind of spin game to back a ball up.
[QUOTE=”Snowman, post: 9706651, member: 3386″]
I’ve played the Soft Feel a few times, not a bad ball. To me, they’re almost 100% interchangeable with the Callaway Supersoft. Surlyn covers get knocked for lack of spin all the time, but both the Soft Feel and Supersoft perform well enough around the green for me. I don’t have the kind of spin game to back a ball up.
[/QUOTE]
They are, I think the Supersoft may launch just a bit higher but thats just an eye test.
I think the supersoft is a bit softer? I like SS in the cold temps, SF for the rest of the year.
[QUOTE=”Carolina Golfer, post: 9706798, member: 44136″]
I think the supersoft is a bit softer? I like SS in the cold temps, SF for the rest of the year.
[/QUOTE]
I think the Supersoft does have lower compression, but I can’t feel any difference when I hit them. A launch monitor might show a difference, but I can’t feel it.
[QUOTE=”Snickerdog, post: 9706645, member: 38739″]
Played this ball today, was 43 at tee time. Great performance off the tee, on approach shots I was seeing minimal rollout (2-4 feet at most). I had some green side chips with a 58° wedge that the ball hopped and stopped on me which surprise [USER=38120]@shanewu[/USER].
Durability wise these are great. Even with some really good wedge contact I didn’t notice any scuffing of the ball.
[/QUOTE]
I honestly don’t remember seeing that kind of action with a non-urethane before on short chips. Really shocked me.
[QUOTE=”shanewu, post: 9711652, member: 38120″]
I honestly don’t remember seeing that kind of action with a non-urethane before on short chips. Really shocked me.
[/QUOTE]
Is this for the current version or previous gen?
I play soft compression balls and found one of these on my last round. really like the color. Does not feel as good as my wilson gamer off the putter face.
Will try to put it in play next time to see if tee to green if I can determine any preferences.
[QUOTE=”Carolina Golfer, post: 9712639, member: 44136″]
Is this for the current version or previous gen?
[/QUOTE]
I was using the current version.
[QUOTE=”Acesteve, post: 9712660, member: 47816″]
I play soft compression balls and found one of these on my last round. really like the color. Does not feel as good as my wilson gamer off the putter face.
Will try to put it in play next time to see if tee to green if I can determine any preferences.
[/QUOTE]
I find the white or yellow ones feel better over the brite matte colors.
[QUOTE=”Carolina Golfer, post: 9715623, member: 44136″]
I find the white or yellow ones feel better over the brite matte colors.
[/QUOTE]
I will test my current gamers this week to see if I can feel any difference in the white vs matte red. clearly the cover is a bit different to hold/feel on the red vs the white.
[QUOTE=”Acesteve, post: 9718167, member: 47816″]
I will test my current gamers this week to see if I can feel any difference in the white vs matte red. clearly the cover is a bit different to hold/feel on the red vs the white.
[/QUOTE]
I tried the prior gen matte brite and was disappointed. Maybe, it has improved. Either way, I am not a matte fan, which may affect my opinion.
Had this ball in play today and am impressed with it still. For me it gives me a bit more distance off the tee and my irons. It does lack green side spin compared to my regular game ball the Chrome Soft. I adjust to that today and allowed for a bit more roll out on chips and was fine.
Durability is excellent on this ball. Same ball for 18 holes today and no marks that would make me take it out of play.
I will test this ball again tomorrow in high winds (above 20mph) and see how it does
I used these golf balls this evening. Not a fan personally. Extreme soft and I couldn’t get any spin.
[QUOTE=”J.B. Cobb III, post: 10724324, member: 50607″]
I used these golf balls this evening. Not a fan personally. Extreme soft and I couldn’t get any spin.
[/QUOTE]
I got them from the budget giveaway and think I will try them next week at league. I have played some low spin balls in the past and want to see how they compare to e12 and Supersoft
I started using these this year. Excellent off the tees but even better on the green. The covers are incredibly durable too. At the price point and scoring point ( for a high handicapper) they have worked out well.
[QUOTE=”Triple Frak, post: 10724337, member: 52535″]
I got them from the budget giveaway and think I will try them next week at league. I have played some low spin balls in the past and want to see how they compare to e12 and Supersoft
[/QUOTE]
Those are the ones I used. I couldn’t hold a green to save my life. I even hit some really high pitches and they still rolled out 20+ feet. But, the greens were super fast today too.
[QUOTE=”Triple Frak, post: 10724337, member: 52535″]
I got them from the budget giveaway and think I will try them next week at league. I have played some low spin balls in the past and want to see how they compare to e12 and Supersoft
[/QUOTE]
I personally find the e12 to be a much better all around ball. But I have no problem with the Soft Feel for those late fall rounds.