Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How does the Mike McQuery still have a job?
Tom Bradley is the interim head coach. Pretty sad how the big story is all about the football team rather than these kids, including a 10 yo.
Bradley just said that McQuery will be coaching on Saturday, but not sure if on the field or not.
So just heard a report that Sandusky was at the Penn State campus as recent as last week and that the school still gives him an office to work out of!! WTF!?!
Wow.....just wow.There was talk of this earlier in the week, apparently he was at the Penn State gym working out, which is something he does quite often.
If it turns out to be true that a deal was made to keep all this quiet in exchange for Sandusky retiring and basically just to stop doing this abuse there at the school, not bringing kids there,, then all of these people should go to jail. Firing is only the first step. Allowing this predator to continue to operate anywhere is reprehensible and if it happened on campus and they knew about it and covered it up that is a federal crime. Don't be surprised if Joe Pa and the rest of his cronies there are indicted. They run that town and they covered this up to protect themselves, to protect Sandusky, to protect the school's image, many things, but the one thing they failed to do is protect these kids.
possible skim alert but I just read this...http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/news?slug=ycn-10407023
maybe nothing but on the other hand it explains a lot
I don't really but this argument... The grand jury report discussed that one of the victims was with Sandusky in 1999 when Paterno told Sandusky he wasn't retiring any time soon, and thus Sandusky would not be the next head coach. Sandusky felt betrayed, since there was a verbal agreement in place for him to take over when Joe Pa stepped down, and retired. Allegedly the rift between him and Joe was severe enough that they weren't on speaking terms from that point on. Also Sandusky wasn't told he couldn't bring kids on campus in 2002, 3 years after his retirement, following PSU's "investigation" into the rape McQueary witnessed.
Either way, it's pretty apparent the Administration orchestrated a cover up. Whether or not Paterno or any others on the football staff were involved or knew about the cover up remains to be seen. Given Paterno wasn't charged with perjury, it's possible to assume his testimony was consistent with McQueary's as far as what McQueary told Joe he witnessed. However, if you are the DA aren't you trying to fry the bigger fish? So by charging the less known people in the cash the DA has created the possibility to a plea deal in exchange for testimony against Paterno and Univ President Spanier regarding the cover up. It will be interesting to see this unravel in the next few weeks.
Its sad just about every news outlet is focusing on Paterno and the football team, and not the victims or the scumbag who perpetrated these heinous acts!
If not these charges of molestation then what else would have caused this 'rift' as you put it between Paterno and Sandusky? Also, why didn't Sandusky just go somewhere else to work as a football coach at that point? Because he had his protective bubble there that allowed him to continue to do what he was doing. That is why the focus is on the coaches and on the football program and the people in that program that knew about this situation and his actions and failed to do what they should have done.
possible skim alert but I just read this...http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/news?slug=ycn-10407023
maybe nothing but on the other hand it explains a lot
possible skim alert but I just read this...http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/news?slug=ycn-10407023
maybe nothing but on the other hand it explains a lot
I was just reading the same article. God I hope that's not true.
\possible skim alert but I just read this...http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/news?slug=ycn-10407023
maybe nothing but on the other hand it explains a lot
\
That is disturbing, very very disturbing. I really hope that this is not true at all.
I can understand that some people don't want to discuss this anymore and obviously rehashing it doesn't really do anything but let people vent and or voice an opinion. But, that being said, I'm not sure that this can be discussed enough. This is the biggest/worst sports related scandal that has ever taken place in my lifetime - and each time I think the bottom has fallen out, something else comes to the surface. Sorry for those who want this thread or story to end, but I'll discuss it as long as other people want to.