- Admin
- #1,701
Maybe I don't know the whole story and if so I'll change my view. But at this point I'm with the players on this one. Contracts already allow players to lose out on the non guaranteed money. If they sign a deal for guaranteed money then I think it should be guaranteed.
I don't see why the player should be the only one that has to accept risk ("believe in your talent"). If you sign a long term contract you are putting yourself at the mercy of the team - coaching, roster, system, etc - a whole slew of things that influence a player's performance. They should be on the hook for their good and bad decisions, too. In other word, it they don't think the player is going to be worth the money in year X then don't agree to it. Also, the problem could be solved easily by paying the guaranteed money at once or having short term contracts. But of course those factors work against the team's interests of spreading out the dollars over multiple years to manage the cap. Again, maybe I'm missing some facts, but it seems like the system is heavily skewed in favor of the teams to me.
There is no such thing as guaranteed money in the NFL. Signing bonus only exists as a loop hole to work with in the cap.
Cant have it both ways. If its a signing bonus, make it what it is and give it to the player for signing the contract. If its yearly pay, make it what it is and pay it by the year. Doing both, and allowing a player to get paid by two teams, and two teams being cap punished goes against the very system of the hard cap (which is the only way a level playing field works).
Its not as if the player has no choice. He can collect the guaranteed money and sit or sign with another team and collect their money. Whichever benefits them more. To me that is like saying that if a player decides to fail 12 drug tests, guaranteed is guaranteed, so he deserves his money. No such thing in the NFL.