bobgeorge
Kentucky Wildcat Fan!
Rory's run away win?...no Tiger? Phil not not on the leaderboard?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I bet. Young Rory isn't moving any needles just yet. If that was Tiger instead of Rory, it would have been near record ratings if not higher.Rory's run away win?...no Tiger? Phil not not on the leaderboard?
Rory's run away win?...no Tiger? Phil not not on the leaderboard?
Garrigus' putter is 5x more famous than he is.
The ratings were actually down even further than that in quarter marks and key demographics. Scary bad.
Casual viewers did not tune in at all.
They have no idea who Rory is.
I love the diehard comments though. I really do. They loved Tiger Woods during his domination because he would, well, dominate. Run away with it and play incredible golf. It appears every time there is a TW thread. "Tiger is more exciting because of his domination".
Yet when Rory does the exact same thing, they did not tune in.
The ratings were actually down even further than that in quarter marks and key demographics. Scary bad.
Casual viewers did not tune in at all.
They have no idea who Rory is.
I love the diehard comments though. I really do. They loved Tiger Woods during his domination because he would, well, dominate. Run away with it and play incredible golf. It appears every time there is a TW thread. "Tiger is more exciting because of his domination".
Yet when Rory does the exact same thing, they did not tune in.
Tiger did it over and over. Rory keeps winning like that and people will start paying attention more. Casual viewers want to see greatness and not some guy who got hot at the right time. A guy who can pull off multiple wins, put Phil in Rory's shoes and the ratings would have gone up. To true fans, Rory is well known, to joe everybody, not so much.
I dont discount count and it what I was saying all weekend in the US Open thread.
However I hate to hear the non-casual fans (the ones here) say that they love to watch domination and then tune out when we saw domination.
jb said:However I hate to hear the non-casual fans (the ones here) say that they love to watch domination and then tune out when we saw domination.
I couldn't agree more. I even read a few people that complained there was no competition because the course was too easy. But easy should equate to all players across the board. There were only 20 people below par and the top 3 in the world were +2 combined. Easier maybe, but not easy. I absolutely loved all 4 rounds.I dont discount count and it what I was saying all weekend in the US Open thread.
However I hate to hear the non-casual fans (the ones here) say that they love to watch domination and then tune out when we saw domination.
I tuned in. I was impressed that Rory was able to pull it all together after fading in the last Masters and British. I was happy for him. He's got a great career ahead of him.The ratings were actually down even further than that in quarter marks and key demographics. Scary bad.
Casual viewers did not tune in at all.
They have no idea who Rory is.
I love the diehard comments though. I really do. They loved Tiger Woods during his domination because he would, well, dominate. Run away with it and play incredible golf. It appears every time there is a TW thread. "Tiger is more exciting because of his domination".
Yet when Rory does the exact same thing, they did not tune in.