- Moderator
- #1
This is something that has intrigued me a lot lately.
Over the last year or so, the standard on iron specs have changed dramatically. Between the strong lofts and added length, the benchmark for getting fitted seems to be less and less universal.
A prime example is the irons I'll likely be playing in the Morgan Cup this year. The Cleveland 588 TTs are one of many clubs that are playing longer than what would be standard in let's say year 2000. Comparing to the set I was last fitted on (half inch long), all standard lengths on the TTs are at or longer than my +1/2 inch set from back in the day.
So my question: For those who typically play "standard" length, would you be inclined to play these irons (or TaylorMade rocketbladez, or Callaway X Hot, etc) without changing the iron lengths? How much value in iron lengths do you put considering many companies are throwing out longer and longer iron standards into the market?
Over the last year or so, the standard on iron specs have changed dramatically. Between the strong lofts and added length, the benchmark for getting fitted seems to be less and less universal.
A prime example is the irons I'll likely be playing in the Morgan Cup this year. The Cleveland 588 TTs are one of many clubs that are playing longer than what would be standard in let's say year 2000. Comparing to the set I was last fitted on (half inch long), all standard lengths on the TTs are at or longer than my +1/2 inch set from back in the day.
So my question: For those who typically play "standard" length, would you be inclined to play these irons (or TaylorMade rocketbladez, or Callaway X Hot, etc) without changing the iron lengths? How much value in iron lengths do you put considering many companies are throwing out longer and longer iron standards into the market?